Woodpecker CI

Technitium DNS Server is a bit more feature rich but honesty I would just run a DNS filter on your router

Sell it

I’m dead serious. They can go for a decent price which should cover the cost of a X86_64 machine

Wireguard has very little attack surface

What’s stopping you from accidentally port forwarding?

For that matter, sometimes ISPs route private addresses even though they aren’t suppose to.

That’s a myth spread by those who have never done networking without NAT

That’s not a situation that is going to arise since devices should block all incoming by default. You could need to explicitly poke holes in the Firewall.

From a network component perspective NAT is not a Firewall. It might run on the same device but it is entirely different function

A stateful Firewall is what provides the security. That has nothing to do with NAT. You can port forward a service or you can create a firewall exception. They both do exactly the same thing.

That’s not how that works

NAT is not a firewall. If you don’t have a Firewall in place bad things will happen.

For IPv6 you just set your Firewall to deny all and then add exceptions as needed. That is the default pretty much everywhere.

NAT is not a security feature

What it does do is make everything more complicated

We ran out in 2015

That’s legacy addressing for you

There is a reason IPv6 is a thing

Just be mindful of people online

That and emotional insecurity

I was mostly talking about relationships and life

Right after WWII it did

Honesty we need a POW system built into http.

You could also throw it behind mTLS

Racism is believing that race has anything to do with cultural things

I wouldn’t eat tuna if it washed up on the beach