• Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    “We need to cut costs! Why are we spending extra to drill these stupid holes all over the vehicle?”

    “Sir, that’s a drain h—”

    “Yeah, I don’t care what they are, I want them gone, or you’re fired.”

    • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      It’s the same guy who will get everyone together in a brainstorming session and have the engineers describe the problem and be like, “what if we drilled holes to let the water escape.” Some cheeky mf’r will even chime in and say, “what about the cost?” Then the elon will do some napkin math and be like, “Ill have Johnson run the numbers, it should be an insignificant amount of spending. Greg have all your guys work OT to get this all sorted.”

    • Droggelbecher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      In my country, you would’nt even be allowed to drive it with a passenger car licence, as it exceeds the max weight for that.

          • Soup@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            I think what they’re getting at is that so many trucks in North America are designed as passenger vehicles first and trucks second. Like, I’ve heard that it can be a struggle to get a two-seater with an 8ft bed and cloth seats but if you want a four-door luxury SUV with a tiny bed slapped on the back then there’s no issue besides the insane price tag for what is supposed to be an abused work vehicle. I love that the Ford Maverick is a thing and somewhat popular but it’s the same problem with its crossover-sized midsection and teeny bed.

            People buy trucks like they can’t get a hitch attached for cheap and just rent or borrow a trailer when they need it once a year at most.

            • CreativeShotgun@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              I haven’t really come across that issue, both styles are available in spades and most of the luxury vehicles are tow capable. I do live in texas tho

              • Soup@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                Tow capability isn’t the problem so much as the $70k+ price tag and the fact that many don’t even tow more than what a sedan can handle just fine. My dad’s STi tows the trailer just fine, ya know? The OG VW Beetle had a camper attachment specifically designed for it. And none of that even points out that vans are better work vehicles than trucks in basically every way including the fact that full-size vans are actually built on truck frames and can also tow just fine.

                I see a LOT of trucks in Ontario and Quebec and when I see a real 8ft bed it’s rare enough to note. Pretty much all of them are 6ft, my friend’s dad who runs a lumber mill said the GM dealership practically told him to keep dreaming when he asked for a cheap replacement for his old S10(i.e. he asked for cloth seats and an 8ft bed; ya know, a work vehicle). Hell, when I do see a full bed it’s probably on a Toyota.

                • CreativeShotgun@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Yeah the tundras are beastly, i know in rural areas it’s more common to find “fleet” trucks though. Basically work trucks with few extra add ons and longer beds. They exist but you gotta ask around. Here in houston they’re rather common, we’re surrounded by tons of industry and rural areas.