Omega@discuss.online to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · edit-21 day agoDo you browse hexbear or have an account in hexbear?message-squaremessage-square125fedilinkarrow-up140arrow-down113file-text
arrow-up127arrow-down1message-squareDo you browse hexbear or have an account in hexbear?Omega@discuss.online to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · edit-21 day agomessage-square125fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareBrainInABox@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·16 hours ago“Suppressing descent is fine if you claim the population ‘overwhelmingly supports’ you” Why even bother with elections at that point? Just claim anybody who wouldn’t vote for you is a RuSsIaN AgEnT
minus-squareSkyezOpen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down5·15 hours agoSupport for eu trade was high enough that yanukovych campaigned on it. Are you saying that’s not true? Also are you saying contracted Russian soldiers weren’t in luhansk and donetsk in 2014 and onward?
minus-squareBrainInABox@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·14 hours ago“Yanukoviych ran on trade with EU, therefor it’s OK to violently suppress dissent” is certainly a take. Also are you saying contracted Russian soldiers weren’t in luhansk and donetsk in 2014 and onward? “Are you saying there aren’t communist spies in America?” -SkyezOpen defending McCarthyism.
minus-squareSkyezOpen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down6·14 hours agoMisrepresenting my stance and refusing to engage with the points isn’t the win you think it is.
minus-squareAntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·11 hours agoJust because it’s not framed in the most generous possible way doesn’t make it a misrepresentation
minus-squareBrainInABox@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down2·14 hours agoLol, who was it that taught shitlibs like you that anyone not immediately agreeing with them is equivalent to “refusing to engage with the points”. I engaged with your points just fine, they’re just bad points.
minus-squareSkyezOpen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down5·13 hours agoMccarthyism is accusing with little or no evidence. There’s piles of evidence of Russian involvement. Hand waving doesn’t make it disappear.
minus-squareBrainInABox@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·13 hours agoThere’s piles of evidence of communist spies operating in America during the cold war too, mate.
minus-squareSkyezOpen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·13 hours agoSo you’re saying it’s all fake?
minus-squareBrainInABox@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·13 hours agoAre you saying there were no communist spies in the US during the cold war?
“Suppressing descent is fine if you claim the population ‘overwhelmingly supports’ you”
Why even bother with elections at that point? Just claim anybody who wouldn’t vote for you is a RuSsIaN AgEnT
Support for eu trade was high enough that yanukovych campaigned on it. Are you saying that’s not true?
Also are you saying contracted Russian soldiers weren’t in luhansk and donetsk in 2014 and onward?
“Yanukoviych ran on trade with EU, therefor it’s OK to violently suppress dissent” is certainly a take.
“Are you saying there aren’t communist spies in America?” -SkyezOpen defending McCarthyism.
Misrepresenting my stance and refusing to engage with the points isn’t the win you think it is.
Just because it’s not framed in the most generous possible way doesn’t make it a misrepresentation
Lol, who was it that taught shitlibs like you that anyone not immediately agreeing with them is equivalent to “refusing to engage with the points”. I engaged with your points just fine, they’re just bad points.
Mccarthyism is accusing with little or no evidence. There’s piles of evidence of Russian involvement. Hand waving doesn’t make it disappear.
There’s piles of evidence of communist spies operating in America during the cold war too, mate.
So you’re saying it’s all fake?
Are you saying there were no communist spies in the US during the cold war?