irelephant [he/him]@programming.devM to iiiiiiitttttttttttt@programming.devEnglish · 3 months agoCiscoi.postimg.ccimagemessage-square22fedilinkarrow-up1357arrow-down12
arrow-up1355arrow-down1imageCiscoi.postimg.ccirelephant [he/him]@programming.devM to iiiiiiitttttttttttt@programming.devEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square22fedilink
minus-squareBeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up28arrow-down1·3 months agoThat’s still a QA issue.
minus-squareEchoCranium@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down4·3 months agoDesign issue. The job of quality is to ensure that the item has been manufactured to meet all design criteria. A product with flaws in the design affecting the end user can still be made to high quality standards.
minus-squareUnderfreyja@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·3 months agoIt’s both, designer/engineer should have known but a good QA team would have caught it.
minus-squareHawke@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·3 months agoCan we compromise and say “design QA”? A poorly designed product is still a problem with “QA” even if it’s the design quality that is poor rather than manufacturing quality.
That’s still a QA issue.
Design issue. The job of quality is to ensure that the item has been manufactured to meet all design criteria. A product with flaws in the design affecting the end user can still be made to high quality standards.
It’s both, designer/engineer should have known but a good QA team would have caught it.
Can we compromise and say “design QA”?
A poorly designed product is still a problem with “QA” even if it’s the design quality that is poor rather than manufacturing quality.