• grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yep. The suggestion one is incomplete because one is autistic is just fucked up. Autists are complete humans.

      (I was trying to agree with your post, but rereading I see I didn’t make the connection explicit, which is ironic in a thread about autism.)

      • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        The suggestion one is incomplete because one is autistic

        Yikes! Is that really the meaning behind it? I naïvely would have assumed that it was referring to autistic people enjoying puzzles…

        • grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          I did a bit of research because before I was speaking from my gut.

          Turns out the puzzle piece was first used in 1963 by the National Autistic Society in the UK. They had a crying child inside a puzzle piece. They no longer use that logo.

          “the puzzle piece is so effective because it tells us something about autism: our children are handicapped by a puzzling condition; this isolates them from normal human contact and therefore they do not ‘fit in’. The suggestion of a weeping child is a reminder that autistic people do indeed suffer from their handicap.” — Helen Allison

          The article The Problem with the Autism Puzzle Piece gives a good overview of current interpretations of the puzzle piece. Naturally, YMMV, all autistic folk are entitled to their own interpretation, etc.

          1. Confusion and mystery.
          2. A problem that needs to be solved.
          3. That autism is a childhood disorder.
          4. Something that is missing. — The Problem with the Autism Puzzle Piece
      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Ah!

        I was too angry upon seeing it to get that you could be, or were, making that point sardonically, or also in derision.

        All good, lol =D