• atrielienz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    Just curious about what your thought is here? How straight are the roads? How often do they have to be resurface or maintenance? Just because there’s a road or highway, the area must be able to support high speed rail? It even regular speed rail? Should they continue to clear swamp land in order to erect high speed rail? Is the plan here to usurp the highway for high speed rail? If so, what happens to those people who still need a vehicle in order to get where they’re going? What happens if they need that highway?

    • RushLana@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      In case this is in good faith :

      There is 4 lanes, you can remove one or two and set train tracks which don’t have a lot of constraints compared to cars due to train wheel being steel and having better adherence.

      People who still need car for whatever reason can use the remaining lanes and have less trafic since train are a lot more efficient than car at moving people.

      If you are woried about the swap I’m sure care exaust and tires particles which are know to damage environement a lot. Trains are electric so at least polution will be localized near power plants and thoose can be eventualy replaced by renewables.

    • ZMoney@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Environmental concerns have never stopped any developed economy from doing what they want. Just look at this area on a map. These objections are not serious. The passenger rail service is trash in the US because of the automobile and hydrocarbon industries.