irelephant [he/him]@programming.devM to iiiiiiitttttttttttt@programming.devEnglish · 2 months agoWe put the Thing That Can't Do Numbers™ in your spreadsheetsprogramming.devimagemessage-square101fedilinkarrow-up1888arrow-down18
arrow-up1880arrow-down1imageWe put the Thing That Can't Do Numbers™ in your spreadsheetsprogramming.devirelephant [he/him]@programming.devM to iiiiiiitttttttttttt@programming.devEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square101fedilink
minus-squareThirdConsul@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·2 months agoNo third-party research ever arrived at such absurdly low number as 1% error rate. Internal OpenAi research from May 2025 said 50% error rate and growing.
minus-squareturdcollector69@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 month agoThis is a headline from a few weeks ago
minus-squareThirdConsul@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoI’m not sure what you’re trying to say here?
minus-squareturdcollector69@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-21 month agoJust giving evidence that companies are bailing from AI, fuel for the fire so to speak
minus-squareThirdConsul@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoAh, sorry, I though you were disagreeing with me by posting a link that companies are unsuccessful with it, so I was confused - because my point was that error rate is gigantic. My bad!
No third-party research ever arrived at such absurdly low number as 1% error rate.
Internal OpenAi research from May 2025 said 50% error rate and growing.
This is a headline from a few weeks ago
I’m not sure what you’re trying to say here?
Just giving evidence that companies are bailing from AI, fuel for the fire so to speak
Ah, sorry, I though you were disagreeing with me by posting a link that companies are unsuccessful with it, so I was confused - because my point was that error rate is gigantic. My bad!