irelephant [he/him]@programming.devM to iiiiiiitttttttttttt@programming.devEnglish · 3 months agoWe put the Thing That Can't Do Numbers™ in your spreadsheetsprogramming.devexternal-linkmessage-square104fedilinkarrow-up1894arrow-down18
arrow-up1886arrow-down1external-linkWe put the Thing That Can't Do Numbers™ in your spreadsheetsprogramming.devirelephant [he/him]@programming.devM to iiiiiiitttttttttttt@programming.devEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square104fedilink
minus-squareThirdConsul@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·3 months agoNo third-party research ever arrived at such absurdly low number as 1% error rate. Internal OpenAi research from May 2025 said 50% error rate and growing.
minus-squareturdcollector69@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·3 months agoThis is a headline from a few weeks ago
minus-squareThirdConsul@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 months agoI’m not sure what you’re trying to say here?
minus-squareturdcollector69@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-23 months agoJust giving evidence that companies are bailing from AI, fuel for the fire so to speak
minus-squareThirdConsul@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 months agoAh, sorry, I though you were disagreeing with me by posting a link that companies are unsuccessful with it, so I was confused - because my point was that error rate is gigantic. My bad!
No third-party research ever arrived at such absurdly low number as 1% error rate.
Internal OpenAi research from May 2025 said 50% error rate and growing.
This is a headline from a few weeks ago
I’m not sure what you’re trying to say here?
Just giving evidence that companies are bailing from AI, fuel for the fire so to speak
Ah, sorry, I though you were disagreeing with me by posting a link that companies are unsuccessful with it, so I was confused - because my point was that error rate is gigantic. My bad!