Kagi has an option to search the Fediverse. This makes it a lot easier than specifying a site in the search query, which would also limit the results to a specific instance.

http://kagi.com/

Why YSK: This lets you easily replace searches like “some topic reddit” with Lemmy!

  • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Just yesterday I cancel d my Kagi subscription because it is based in the US. I liked it though, for the few years I’ve used it. Also a lot of good progress going on.

    I switched to Qwant as it is European.

  • NotNotMike@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    1 day ago

    The idea of searching had me thinking that it would be nice to have a search-focused instance that didn’t defederate from any sites (besides the illegal stuff) and auto-subscribes to every new community so it has all the information possible. Then you could do “foo bar site:searchlemmy.com” and get an effect similar to reddit

    Although that’s probably unnecessary. But would be kind of cool

    • Revanee@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 day ago

      That sounds like a pretty good idea, since most search engines don’t play very well with the fediverse. Could be a good workaround. I’m wondering how expensive it would be to host something like that. Maybe someone with experience hosting instances could give an estimate?

    • FundMECFS@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I like lemm.ee is as close as you can get. AFAIK it’s federated with pretty much everyone and it’s got a very large userbase so nearly every conmunity is federated.

      • CubitOom@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        Wait, a large userbase is required for an instance to federate with every community? I thought you could host a single user instance but still be federated with everything that you don’t explicitly block.

        • can@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          23 hours ago

          Remote communities don’t federate until a user subscribed to them. There is this tool to automate it however.

          When you create a new community, it will only be available to your instance. To make it accessible to other instances, at least one user from each remote instance must follow it.

          This tool automates this process by following your community from all remote instances until it gains at least one real-user follower.

  • Starayo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Cool! I’ve been looking at kagi for a long while but hadn’t bit the bullet due to the cost. They did a month free trial thing recently and I’ve been using it since and it’s been really nice. Think I’ll stick with it.

    I really like the ability to make custom lenses (like predefined groups of sites to search) and a built in way to block sites or change their priority in listings. Can do that to Google with extensions like ublacklist, but this way I don’t need to export my settings to other devices.

    • Revanee@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Glad you like it!

      I’m in the same boat. Paying for search put me off at first, in big part due to having to login to use it. But now that I’ve tried, it’s a lot easier to use than expected. For example, you can get a session link to use for incognito searches, or an even more private option with anonymous tokens that let you use it without the searches being linked to your account at all.

      The more I think about it, the more sense it makes. If a search engine is free, its goals won’t be aligned with my interests as a user and we get stuff like sponsored search results.

      • Starayo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        23 hours ago

        I also like that they let me turn off the AI results and I never have to see them again on any of my devices.

      • CubitOom@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Can you talk more about this extra private option with anonymous tokens? I haven’t seen this yet.

        • Revanee@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Sure! It’s what they call Privacy Pass. It’s implemented using an extension that’s available on most browsers (including Tor). The extension uses a session to generate tokens This step is linked to the account. The tokens themselves are not linked to an account, but are used to access Kagi itself afterwards. When you search using Privacy Pass, the extension offers those tokens instead of a cookie, so you lose any user preferences you’ve previously set up. Those searches are not linked to an account.

          More info: https://help.kagi.com/kagi/privacy/privacy-pass.html

          You can also create an account with a throwaway email and pay with bitcoin, so at that point I think it’s pretty good for anonymity

          • CubitOom@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            21 hours ago

            This is awesome, thanks.

            However I would argue that bitcoin is not anonymous, maybe monero but you have to also anonymize the on ramp. Mullvad will let you mail in cash, which I’d say is pretty anonymous.

      • Revanee@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        From what I saw in the discussions regarding this topic, it seems they’re using various third party indexes alongside their own, similar to how Qwant does it with Bing. It’s unfortunate, but realistically other than building a full index like the one Google has, I don’t see many other options. Google and Bing are plenty evil as well, not just Brave and Yandex. Maybe if the Qwant + Ecosia index works out, then we won’t have to rely on companies like that. For now their position doesn’t seem unreasonable to me: https://kagifeedback.org/d/2808-reconsider-your-partnership-with-brave