I’m looking for perspectives on which countries most effectively combine high quality of life with low social and economic inequality.

  • MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    If you’re going to start nationalizing previously established resources, that’s going to have all sorts of wild reprecussions and is not what Norway did.

    But beyond the logistics, which similarly profitable resources are you thinking of?

    • njm1314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Well of course it won’t be the same. Thats why you have to export it.

      All of them. All of a nations natural resources rightfully belong to the people from oil to water. From rare earth minerals to timber.

      • MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        All of a nations natural resources rightfully belong to the people

        Yes and we have a liberal democracy to determine how best to use them. Thankfully, most folks understand that simply nationalizing resources comes with huge reprecussions which greatly outweigh the gains.

        Do you have a successful example of your proposal in mind?

        • Cooper8@feddit.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Most Oil and Gas reserves remaining in the US are on public land, as is the massive lithium deposit just discovered in southeastern Oregon. Then there are the seabed polymetalic nodules that will be mined sooner or later. There are plenty of opportunities to nationalize natural resources, what is lacking is political will.