hoch@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 3 days agoMore code = more betterimagemessage-square25fedilinkarrow-up1277arrow-down16
arrow-up1271arrow-down1imageMore code = more betterhoch@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 3 days agomessage-square25fedilink
minus-squareferric_carcinization@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 days agoI don’t know what I was thinking. But, if you borrow C’s semantics, you are allowed to “optimize” away side-effect-less loops, even if they would never terminate. But that would require the random method to be pure.
I don’t know what I was thinking.
But, if you borrow C’s semantics, you are allowed to “optimize” away side-effect-less loops, even if they would never terminate. But that would require the random method to be pure.