I keep hearing how everyone’s electric bills are going up with AI data centers near them. Why aren’t the companies paying the bill? Or is it building the infrastructure to accommodate them the issue?

  • TwoTiredMice@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I don’t think it’s all bad in the long run. A higher base load also give higher incentives to install renewable energy. In Denmark we have issues with the cannibalisation effect, i.e. We have reach a point where it’s no longer financially viable to install more renewable assets. We often see negative power prices on windy and sunny days, which forces the renewable asset owners to either turn off their assets during these periods, or pay the negative spot price.

    • village604@adultswim.fan
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      The US is very different in that regard. This will only be a detriment to the consumers, because extra capacity will be provided by fossil fuels.

      • TwoTiredMice@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        56 minutes ago

        But still, wouldn’t renewable assets suppliers have an incentive to install assets in these areas? If the spot price is high and they can produce “free” electricity, their earnings are a lot higher than the fossil fuel plants.