Samsung Smart TV owners can now use Jellyfin natively, as the open-source media server is now available on the Tizen platform.

  • Joelk111@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    1 day ago

    People into Jellyfin use smart TVs? I haven’t connected mine to the internet.

    • kieron115@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It’s relatively easy to restrict a smart tv to TLS/HTTPS traffic only using your router and a dns adblocker.

          • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            You have to do a lot of work. You would have to keep up on what domains it’s using (which were in the dozens four years ago for samsung), and make sure it doesn’t use some as kill switches if it finds something blocked.

            We aren’t stopping just ads, we are stopping spying, data sharing, snooping, network mapping, etc.

            • kieron115@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Yeah. To be honest on the DNS side it would probably be far easier to just do a whitelist instead, block everything except your specific service. and yeah, its a stupid amount of work. i hate smart tvs but i’ll be damned if im gonna pay extra for a streaming box =|

                • kieron115@startrek.website
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  to get something as flexible as my android tv i’d need an nvidia shield and those are going on ten years old at this point. maybe if/when they do a hardware refresh, assuming sideloading isn’t completely impossible by then.

        • kieron115@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          no it helps to block everything that isnt just netflix or whatever streaming service you use. you combine a DNS adblock along with blocking all the unused ports and it severely limits the communications. you could also add a vpn to add another layer of security. idk about jellyfin but most streaming services i know use https/443 to stream to your tv. so youre only allowing the specific service you want and only on a specific port. buncha great dns blocklists here https://github.com/hagezi/dns-blocklists, and a smart tv specific one for pihole here https://github.com/Perflyst/PiHoleBlocklist/blob/master/SmartTV.txt

          • prenatal_confusion@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Hardcoded IPS circumvent DNS blocks.

            Restricting ports doesn’t do anything since the TV isn’t running a service, it is contacting one.

            Correct me if I am wrong.

            • kieron115@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 hours ago

              Not sure if you mean hardcoded DNS IPs or hardcoded “phone home” IPs. Hardcoded DNS addresses in devices are annoying, the only way i’ve found to get around that is using destination nat rules (DNAT) which requires more than a consumer router typically. hardcoded phone home IPs would get blocked by your firewall. you’re right that most firewalls are set up by default to implicitly allow outbound traffic. you set up a rule that denies all outbound traffic from the TV, then only allow port 443 (or whatever port your streaming service uses) on the specific IP/IPs that your service uses. Here’s Netflix’s published IP info for example.

              edit also i’m fully aware it’s fucking ridiculous that we as consumers have to go through this much rigamarole. you shouldnt have to be a literal network engineer to do something as simple as have a tv that doesnt spy on you.

    • tempest@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I do? I don’t love Android TV but I only have so much time to fight to the good fight with shit.

      I would like a less smart tv but I don’t want to by a 7 year old Nvidia Shield and suffered paralysis by analysis trying to decide on on an Android TV box.

      So here we are, I use jellyfin on a smart TV

      • charles@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Out of curiosity why are you reluctant to buy a Shield?

        I was on the fence for a while but I’ve been extremely happy with it and have only run into minimal issues (and significantly less than with my smart tv before).

          • VieuxQueb@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            14 hours ago

            It pisses me off that the reason most tech get filled with ads and shit is because people want to use it but are not bothered to learn anything about it. Like input selection, they need to press one button and everything has to be setting itself up without interaction or they will complain it’s too hard.

            Then the ad company makes shit to make it seem easy but fills it up with spyware and ads. Lazy People adopt the easy way and endure the shit that comes with it while bending for more.

    • Mikelius@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Having a smart tv doesn’t mean you must use internet to utilize it. Mine is blocked from internet connectivity but connects to my media server on the local network. If anything, I prefer this so I don’t need an extra computer sitting in the living room and can instead use the same single media server my phones and computers do.

    • rudyharrelson@lemmy.radio
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      85
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Not every Jellyfin user is also the server administrator. If someone sets up a server and shares that server with 5 people, most of those users aren’t concerned with the privacy implications of how they connect to the server; they just want to consume content as easily as they do with Netflix, Disney, etc.

      • kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Not every Jellyfin user is also the server administrator.

        That’s true but every Jellyfin host has to be.

    • ccunix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      19 hours ago

      We have both.

      Kodi use Jellyfin for its media library and Kodi is excellent for a lot of the TV we watch. catch Up TV has replaced the decoder for watching terrestrial TV.

      One thing that sucks in Kodi though is Arte (a franco-german channel that is a leans towards “intellectual”). For that, the LG WebOS app is much better than the Kodi add-on. Other than that 1 app, we could happily plug Kodi into digital signage panel if they weren’t stupidly expensive.

    • Grass@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      Family connect to my server with tv. If tv is in the same house everything is blocked and select things are whitelisted.