China has formally launched a dispute at the World Trade Organization (WTO) over tariffs imposed by US President Donald Trump on Chinese goods, the Geneva-based body said on Wednesday.

Trump on Saturday ordered tariffs on goods from Mexico, Canada and China, demanding they staunch the flow of fentanyl – and, in the case of Canada and Mexico illegal immigration.

He later froze tariffs against the two North American countries but went ahead with those on China.

China, which Trump subjected to a tariff of 10 per cent on goods exports, had vowed to challenge the step at the WTO.

In a statement cited by the WTO, China said the measures appeared to be inconsistent with US obligations under the agreement that led to the creation of the trade body, pointing to the discriminatory nature of the tariffs.

“China reserves the right to raise additional measures and claims regarding the matters identified herein during the course of consultations and in any future request for the establishment of a panel,” the Chinese statement said.

It did not detail what measures those could be.

Since December 2019, the WTO’s dispute settlement system has been effectively paralysed following the collapse of its Appellate Body which has the final say on disputes.

Trump’s first administration and that of Joe Biden blocked the appointment of new judges to the Appellate Body over what they saw as judicial overreach in disputes.

The body is unable to function with less than three judges.

Archive link

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s pretty straight forward, the US is blocking the appointment to paralyze WTO which makes it impossible to resolve many cases that have piled up against them.

      • Maeve@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        Since the United States has proven time and again to not act in good faith, what steps could the UN and WTO realistically take to limit our power?

        • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          None. US has universal veto power and/or can just ignore whatever the UN says. Like they’ve been doing for the issues regarding Cuba or Israel.

          • Maeve@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 hours ago

            I was wondering if member states could rewrite the charter without USA on board.

        • TrippyFocus@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Those organizations specifically? Not much, the major powers within them have always had a level of veto or other powers that effectively make them untouchable.

          The other major powers, like China have to counter us more directly since we’ll likely see international orgs slowly become more inept as this country goes more mask off with its facism and imperialism.

    • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      14 hours ago

      China only does things that lead to long-term stability and shipping fentanyl to the US is not one of those things. History shows us that the most likely culprits for drug running on the US is the CIA, who are entirely responsible for the crack epidemic, or the pharmaceutical industry, who are entirely responsible for the opioid epidemic.

      • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 hours ago

        For ppl who want to learn more about this, I highly recommend Gary Webb’s Dark Alliance book. Its long but a thrilling read. Also he was “suicided” for exposing the US’s drug-running operations.