riskiedingo@lemmy.world to iiiiiiitttttttttttt@programming.dev · 13 days agoStill got ours rockin' years later!lemmy.worldimagemessage-square55fedilinkarrow-up1645arrow-down15
arrow-up1640arrow-down1imageStill got ours rockin' years later!lemmy.worldriskiedingo@lemmy.world to iiiiiiitttttttttttt@programming.dev · 13 days agomessage-square55fedilink
minus-squarermuk@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·13 days agoI maintain that even for LANs 100Mb/s is actually more than enough for the majority of users as long as the latency is decent.
minus-squareSwizzleStick@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·12 days agoIf I’m paying for 200M, I’m damn well gonna use it :) I can actually run a few services now on the 200/200 that would be intolerable on the old 30/10. Like streaming and grabbing chunky files away from home in reasonable time. Was a big jump for us.
I maintain that even for LANs 100Mb/s is actually more than enough for the majority of users as long as the latency is decent.
If I’m paying for 200M, I’m damn well gonna use it :)
I can actually run a few services now on the 200/200 that would be intolerable on the old 30/10. Like streaming and grabbing chunky files away from home in reasonable time. Was a big jump for us.