Been thinking about the voting system lately and how it inevitably kills in-depth discussion in growing communities.
Every sub/community follows the same trajectory: starts small with passionate users sharing quality content/discussion → grows in popularity → memes and low-effort posts flood in → actual discussion gets buried or downvoted.
I’m guilty of this too tbh. I realized I use upvotes/downvotes as personal “like/dislike” buttons rather than judging relevance to the community.
Here’s my hot take:
- Voting should be restricted to subscribed users only
- Downvotes should be capped at a fraction of total upvotes a user gives out
The clearest example of this failure is gonewild. The demographics mean male content (which is 100% allowed) gets mass-downvoted into oblivion while female content dominates the front page. It’s not about quality or relevance anymore - it’s just a popularity contest.
Anyone else feel like the voting system needs a complete rethink?
WWIII is happening and you’re worried about optimizing your gooning
WWIII is happening and you’re worried about someone worried about optimising their gooning.
They almost had me in the first half with the discussion-of-discussion, which is relevant to everything if you lie to yourself. And god knows we do
How about post-Epstein files people stop letting anyone speak like this about the epimping segment of a website that gained notoriety for having a community centered around stalking and grooming underaged girls
Who’s doing what where?