• cy_narrator@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    16 hours ago

    MX, antiX and Gentoo are the only distros that support a non systemd init system without making a big deal about it like its normal to have a different choice as a linux user

    • Obin@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      That’s what I always loved about Gentoo. Users are interested to have a system with systemd: Gentoo supports it and got you covered. Users are interested to have a system with OpenRC: Gentoo supports it and got you covered. There’s even a couple of people who want to use runit or s6 (and maybe others I’ve missed) and they’re there in the official repos, but depending on your needs you’ll have to do some work on top of that. Similar story with device managers, tempfile managers etc.

  • fozid@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Good read. Although I recently moved to void Linux as I prefer rolling release instead of a major upgrade every few years.

    • kirk781@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I also am on Void since past couple of years. Paired it with LxQt DE for sometime. I didn’t have much opinion (or even cared) about systemd (which Void eschews in favor of runit) when I chose it in my distro hopping days. It’s lean and clean though package repos slightly smaller than competing ones.

      • jcr@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        Français
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I had a very good ride with Void for 3 years, a polished distro which taught me to play with init.

        But a lot of GNU packages are not packaged, and lastly I saw a news regarding the distro being split between pro and free version so …

        I used Antix after that, but AntiX can really get behind on package and kernel version, so I stumbled back on Devuan, and voilà ! With backport, Devuan is really like Debian without the hassle of never knowing if your system us really shut down when you close your laptop (systemd ! 🫵)

      • fozid@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        cool, i use sway / wayland. really happy with how it all runs, although only been on it a couple of weeks after over a decade on arch.

    • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      You still get “major releases” with rolling distros. They’re just smaller. Updating to new plasma/gnome versions, new glibc, etc.

      • fozid@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        16 hours ago

        i should have been clearer, there is no distro major release. packages have major release sure, but no large distro upgrade.

        • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 hours ago

          After years of running a rolling distro (gentoo) I had come to realize that it was a bit of a distinction without a difference. Major updates simply felt less planned than a ‘traditional’ distro.

    • kirk781@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I think I had used fluxbox once. I see that it was a fork of Blackbox originally. Is fluxbox more feature rich now than Blackbox? (I am assuming former would be more popular than it’s original fork now ).

  • durinn@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    Used it once on a laptop whose fan had died and which I in retrospect shouldn’t have used no matter how little I tax the CPU, but, it worked. antiX at least let me boot up, save my data and then discard the laptop.