Hofmaimaier@feddit.org to NoSafetySmokingFirst@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 2 months agonot til notfeddit.orgimagemessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up1271arrow-down12
arrow-up1269arrow-down1imagenot til notfeddit.orgHofmaimaier@feddit.org to NoSafetySmokingFirst@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square17fedilink
minus-squarecorsicanguppy@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16arrow-down1·edit-22 months agoAt least they wrote “'til” with one L. I’ll give them a pass here, as it’s an increasingly rare bit of adequacy.
minus-squareegrets@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·edit-22 months agoI don’t know whether it ever took hold in the US, but “till” without an apostrophe is valid in the UK and not only is it not a contraction of “until”, it predates it and is the root of the word.
minus-squaretomenzgg@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 months agoIt’s also valid (and the standard form) in the U. S. But the assumption it’s a contraction of “until” has been around for a while, I think.
minus-squarethreelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.worksMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 months agoThanks! TIL :)
At least they wrote “'til” with one L. I’ll give them a pass here, as it’s an increasingly rare bit of adequacy.
I don’t know whether it ever took hold in the US, but “till” without an apostrophe is valid in the UK and not only is it not a contraction of “until”, it predates it and is the root of the word.
It’s also valid (and the standard form) in the U. S.
But the assumption it’s a contraction of “until” has been around for a while, I think.
Thanks! TIL :)
till*