PixelNomad@sopuli.xyz to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 19 hours agoAre people who make 200k a year "poor"?message-squaremessage-square21fedilinkarrow-up15arrow-down19
arrow-up1-4arrow-down1message-squareAre people who make 200k a year "poor"?PixelNomad@sopuli.xyz to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 19 hours agomessage-square21fedilink
minus-squareSoulphite@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·19 hours agoLooking at you, San Francisco. .
minus-squareAndy@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·16 hours ago$200k is not poor in San Francisco. It’s still significantly above average, even in San Francisco.
minus-squareRoguelazer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·15 hours agoLicensed childcare runs between $2500 and $4000 per month per child here in the Bay Area; $200k salary is about $150k after tax. Doesn’t take a terribly big family to totally exhaust that amount if both parents need to work to bring it in.
minus-squareAndy@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·13 hours agoI’m not saying that you can’t run out of money if you make $200k. I’m saying that it’s not poor. If earning well above average in an area with a high concentration of high earners can be poor, the word means nothing.
Looking at you, San Francisco. .
$200k is not poor in San Francisco.
It’s still significantly above average, even in San Francisco.
Licensed childcare runs between $2500 and $4000 per month per child here in the Bay Area; $200k salary is about $150k after tax. Doesn’t take a terribly big family to totally exhaust that amount if both parents need to work to bring it in.
I’m not saying that you can’t run out of money if you make $200k. I’m saying that it’s not poor.
If earning well above average in an area with a high concentration of high earners can be poor, the word means nothing.