To test drive this I needed to apply some configuration tweaks, but the built-in ad blocker seems to just work. I tried it out on YouTube and a few other sites, and I haven’t seen so much as a hitch.

Here’s a look at the configuration screen, which currently resides at the top of Settings > Privacy:

AjFP7r2ZeMYur6O.png

Ads from the default search provider are enabled (per their request), but disabling them is pretty straightforward. Other functionality, like toggling the default filter lists (12 are enabled by default) or adding your own are accessible via buttons.

Lists enabled by default:

  • Default
    • EasyList
    • EasyPrivacy
    • uBO Filters
    • uBO quick-fixes
    • uBO unbreak
  • Privacy
    • AdGuard Tracking Protection
    • Peter Lowe’s Ad and Tracking Server List
    • uBO Badware
    • uBO Privacy
    • uBO Resource Abuse
  • Annoyances
    • EasyCookie
    • uBO annoyances-cookies

Other available lists:

  • Fanboy’s Annoyances
  • Fanboy’s Anti-Chat
  • Fanboy’s Anti-Newsletter
  • Fanboy’s Mobile Notifications
  • Fanboy’s Social
  • 34 more Regional lists
  • Prinz Kasper@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    My understanding is that this ad blocker is running at rhe browser engine level and is therefore faster and more powerful than a JavaScript tool limited by the manifest API. I love uBlock origin and have been using it for years, but if this is better, why be hostile to it?

      • XLE@piefed.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        It’s a Rust implementation of ad blocking, which is separate from the Brave code people don’t like.

        If we wrote off all code written by bigots, we couldn’t use old Firefox code. Or new Firefox code.