cross-posted from: https://mander.xyz/post/52771375

The European Union has opened an investigation into Chinese e-commerce giant JD.com’s proposed €2.2 billion takeover of German electronics retailer Ceconomy, which is the second-largest shareholder of French group Fnac Darty. Regulators suspect the bid may involve Chinese subsidies.

Web Archive link

The European Commission announced on Thursday that it is examining the transaction under the bloc’s Foreign Subsidies Regulation – the first time a Chinese deal has been targeted under rules designed to prevent state-backed firms getting an unfair advantage in the EU’s single market.

JD.com may have received foreign subsidies distorting the EU internal market,” the Commission said in a statement, citing possible support including “preferential financing, tax incentives and grants” potentially attributable to the Chinese government.

Beijing-based JD.com – short for Jingdong – rejected the concerns, stating the acquisition would not be funded by foreign subsidies from China or any other state.

“We consider the in-depth review of a transaction of this scale to be a normal procedural step,” JD.com said in a statement to French press agency AFP, adding that its acquisition of Ceconomy would be financed “by bank loans and cash from our ordinary activities”.

Ceconomy owns the MediaMarkt, Saturn and MediaWorld chains, with more than a thousand stores across Europe, including in Germany, Italy, Spain and Austria.

The probe has also intensified scrutiny in France, where Ceconomy holds a 22 percent stake in Fnac Darty, a major entertainment and electronics retailer.

Under the Foreign Subsidies Regulation, the European Commission can impose fines, suspend tenders or block takeovers by state-funded firms.

The commission says it was officially notified about the Ceconomy acquisition on 17 April and “now has 90 working days, until 2 October 2026, to take a decision”.

  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Okay so this is embarrassing, this article is the one that led me to realise the JD.com name I’ve seen pop up in a few places recently has nothing to do with the British sportswear brand JD Sports…

    A few things make a bit more sense now…