• Count042@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Difference is that they want EVERYONE to get cancer. They want EVERYONE to die. That’s what poking holes in a lifeboat does. And if you were in a lifeboat, and someone started poking holes in it, you would kill them if only in self defense.

    You want to defend those who want to sink the lifeboat. I’m not sure why, but that doesn’t make you moral.

    • AlvinTheChipmunk@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 hour ago

      You want to defend those who want to sink the lifeboat. I’m not sure why, but that doesn’t make you moral.

      Where the hell did I say I’m defending billionaires? I’m not. I’m defending everyone’s right to feel what they feel because you’re entitled to that, and I’m defending your right to free speech, which you have because of the First Amendment.

      If you want to say, “All billionaires deserve to die,” that’s your right to say that. You are entitled to feel that way. I’m entitled to say, "Your kids deserve cancer, or they deserve to be murdered in a school shooting.

      • backalleycoyote@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        46 minutes ago

        I mean, if my kid was a wealth hoarding, kid diddling, entitled, exploitative little shit, I’d wish some cancer on them.

        Your error is that you’re punching down. If you can find a 12yo billionaire with a rap sheet like Donald Trump, fuck it, that’s a pretty terrible human being and it’s got a lot of years ahead of it. But most kids aren’t that vile. They’re not even in control of their own day to day lives, much less running governments and industry. Killing them solves nothing. Besides, they’re already getting cancer from the waste of the capitalist system, so you don’t even have to wish it; they’ve got it.