I personally do, he actually risked his life to release information about the government spying on people. And there are for sure more advanced ways now. Even your phone is listening.

  • tacosanonymous@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    15 days ago

    I remember seeing that film and thinking, “they wish they could do this.” They’ve tried pretty hard and somehow been more sinister about it.

      • tacosanonymous@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        15 days ago

        I mean, there were definitely cameras everywhere but they werent part of a system(closed circuit and they looked awful). Hell, they still look like shit most of the time.

        Hackman had MFs zooming in on people’s faces 100 yards out from atm cameras and stuff.

        Obviously, the state wants this but it’s not there yet. If it was, it’d feel extra bad how many murders and other heinous crimes they just give up on.

        • edible_funk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          Isn’t that the whole point of the AI push? To get us fully into that level of surveillance state, and to have it automated? Flock is doing its part but really they don’t need cameras to track people anymore.

          • tacosanonymous@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 days ago

            Sure but we were talking about 1998.

            The real agency has certainly gotten closer to that dystopia than the film.

            Wholeheartedly agree about not needing cameras.