Based on recent comments this feels like a discussion we should have. So…topic, basically.

I’m not looking to be chief noisemaker on this, but I stand by what I wrote in !privacy and what’s in my post history.

https://lemmy.ml/post/48724623/26190950

Let’s have at; do we want a [AI] and [NOT AI] tag. Why or why not?

  • Ooops@feddit.orgEnglish
    42·
    4 hours ago

    A mandatory [AI] tag? Sure.

    A [NOT AI] tag? No, that’s the default. Why normalise AI bullshit even further?

    • communism@lemmy.mlEnglish
      17·
      3 hours ago

      But mandating [NOT AI] means that people have to go out of their way to declare their work is AI-free. It requires active lying rather than lying by omission—I think there are a non-zero number of people who would be inclined to omit an AI tag but would not want to go as far as explicitly lying about their work being AI-free.

      • zikzak025@lemmy.worldEnglish
        2·
        39 minutes ago

        Agreed. “Failed to disclose” isn’t condemned as harshly as “Blatantly lied”, even if it should be. So obfuscating a project’s AI usage may be seen as less risky than being upfront about it.

        A responsibly transparent project should advertise itself as AI-free if it truly is.