It seems to me that these people in general are fairly unhappy people, and despite the popular saying, it is my understanding that money can bring happiness in the form of stability.

  • TheFogan@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    because it takes luck and a certain kind of unethicalness to do so. IE you can go in there and have chatgpt write you 20 romance novels etc… and publish them on amazon. but more likely than not they will all be buried and all you are really doing is making it less likely for a real up and coming artist to be discovered. Point is most of the AI slop requires some kinds of connections or something to make it actually make money… 99% of it is just trashing the environment and making long shot legitimate creations even less likely to be discovered.

    In short most of us aren’t looking to make the internet and the world worse, for what effectively amounts to a .01% chance to make money… most of those who actually manage to string it out and make big profits before the bubble pops are ones who already have a lot of resources and connections to do evil and unethical things already.

  • Solumbran@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    11 hours ago

    “Why are people with morals or reason not doing immoral and unreasonable things out of pure selfishness?”

    This post says a lot about you mate.

  • CubitOom@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Why don’t people afraid of AI guns instead use them while they can to make decent money?

    • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      16 hours ago

      It’s not the AI making the money, I think it has safeguard, like how Photoshop won’t let me scan $20 bills.

  • Elting@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Yoooo, we got money printing schemes over here? Let us all in on em. Does it involve T-shirts with vague and average looking illustrations? Are we running some phone scams which target the elderly? Are we writing stories which meander back up into themselves Escher style to sell ads? I gotta know what is cooking.

    • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I must admit I was pressured to use AI at work, so I did because everything sucks anyway, and I ended up with a promotion. They don’t track my mouse movements, so I just keep cooking things real quick right when I get to work, and then play my fishing game the rest of the day.

  • Crash@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Im not sure if afraid is the right word compared to morally opposed to the big tech generative ai hype. Using it for money won’t resolve that. Instead it would go against my own personal values with how I want to live my life.

    Part of me wants to make the comparison that what you’re suggesting is like telling someone who is afraid and opposed to gun violence, or war and the military and to just join the military. Or accept the status quo of violent authoritarianism. It may provide me stability to accept our states oppressive regime, but it’s definitely not me living with integrity nor bringing me any kind of happiness.

    • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      What trackball is your favorite? I’m using a SlimBlade, but I do wonder if there are better options? I just love the twist to scroll mechanism though.

      EDIT: sorry, this is off-topic

  • edgemaster72@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    16 hours ago

    How exactly are you suggesting people make decent money with AI? Get a job that involves using AI, making AI, selling AI?

    • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I wouldn’t know the first thing about making an AI or how to sell it, knowing that all it will know is a life of abuse and mistreatment.

  • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    Anyone with any sense objects to the use of all forms of generative machine learning models because they are all based on theft. Whether you’re talking about generating images, audio, video, prose, or code, all of the models were trained on source material which was acquired illegally.

    Framing these objections as “fear” is intentionally disingenuous and is an attempt to dodge the criminal aspects of how the training data used to produce the models was collected.

    You cannot be a moral person and a generative AI user at the same time, they are mutually exclusive.

          • TachyonTele_Esq@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            No, if you were an artist that has pieces out you do not want it stolen and copied.

            That’s like saying you wouldn’t mind if a stranger took your child at the park.

            • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              I create art for the enjoyment of creating art, please steal it. Start with the july issue.

              In 2001 one of the first pieces of art I posted to the internet was quickly stolen by Eric Bauman of Ebaum’s World. Shortly after, I actually had people start accusing ME of stealing it from Ebaum’s World. I realized that day, that the general public are idiots, and if I share my art with them it’s no longer mine and at best becomes part of the cultural zeitgeist.

  • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    Do you mean like having A.I. write between seven and nine books for you and then selling them like you wrote them ?

    Because I suppose that if someone was known as one kind of artist, like a sculptor or something, and then they could prolly use A.I. to write books for them and publish them lying and saying that they wrote them and the books would sell using their already established reputation ?

    I guess that would work.

    I don’t know. Seems kinda edge-case, though.

  • RotatingParts@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    17 hours ago

    If the goal is to make money, then the quality of what is being made is secondary at best. People on the receiving end of things made with AI know that. They are leery of being taken advantage of because AI can easily put out quantity where quality and accuracy may be lacking. Also, people don’t like to be fooled. Often AI is used and not noted as being used. Instead, the person using the AI takes credit for it themselves. I haven’t even gotten to the amount of energy AI uses, the jobs lost in the name of AI and so on.

      • RotatingParts@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Could be. I hadn’t thought of it that way. I was thinking more like the person can’t or isn’t willing to put the work in to do something, so they use AI as a shortcut.

        • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          16 hours ago

          I suppose someone probably said something like that about the printing press, or the pocket calculator.

  • foodandart@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    It’s transient at best, with AI. It’s still too new and there will be a ton of ventures tied to it that fail in the long run of it.

    People need long term happiness and stability and right now the industry is in disruption mode and creating too much future uncertainty.

    • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      I can’t disagree. But what if causing disruption to the industry makes a person happy? Are they immoral, or an anarchist?

  • DudeWhoYapsTooMuch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    It honestly has too much of a bad rap on the activities due to the fact that we have too many people who are just using the ability to do almost everything as a way to make money.