the_flying_pig@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · 21 hours agoAte there more galaxies in the universe, than stars that can be seen from Earth with the naked eye, or with a telescope?message-squaremessage-square40fedilinkarrow-up163arrow-down12
arrow-up161arrow-down1message-squareAte there more galaxies in the universe, than stars that can be seen from Earth with the naked eye, or with a telescope?the_flying_pig@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · 21 hours agomessage-square40fedilink
minus-squareDavel23@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up7·20 hours agoThe Hubble Deep Field imaged an area of the sky effectively the size of a tennis ball as seen from 100 meters away. It captured over 3000 objects almost all of which were galaxies. So yes, WAY more galaxies. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hubble_Deep_Field
minus-squarePhoenixz@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up1·17 hours agoA tennis ball at 100 meters? That’d be a single pixel on many cameras at that range, thst doesnt sound right I remember reading it was about the size of your thumb nail at an arms length
The Hubble Deep Field imaged an area of the sky effectively the size of a tennis ball as seen from 100 meters away. It captured over 3000 objects almost all of which were galaxies. So yes, WAY more galaxies.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hubble_Deep_Field
A tennis ball at 100 meters? That’d be a single pixel on many cameras at that range, thst doesnt sound right
I remember reading it was about the size of your thumb nail at an arms length
I’m going by what Wikipedia says.