…so why are people so up in arms against bans and restrictions on children having access to social media, where they have even less oversight and can do so themselves?

  • GreenBeard@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Quite frankly yes. Proof of identity is kind of one of the core roles of government. Handing it off to private corporations is like entrusting a nation’s military to private militias and policing to gangs.

    • Dookieman12@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Age verification doesn’t have to mean identity verification.

      Parents and human moderators solved this problem just fine. Everything changed when every platform wanted to be the first to cut moderation costs by using LLMs instead.

      They abandoned a perfectly working system and have been pitching a fit about restarting it because “it costs too much” ever since.

      • GreenBeard@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I’ll grant it’s an automation issue. Age verification is always identity verification when it’s automated. It doesn’t matter how much you try to scrub the data. If it has to be done algorithmically, there’s no possible circumstance where an unaccountable third party should have that data.