After staring at the tiles for 30 seconds I found the pattern (4 aligned rows followed by an offset row), but… why the hell would you lay these out like that? It looks so jumbled.
After staring at the tiles for 30 seconds I found the pattern (4 aligned rows followed by an offset row), but… why the hell would you lay these out like that? It looks so jumbled.
This might have been done to allow “get right” points. If this is down a long aisle or corridor that wasnt built perfectly straight or parrallel(or various other reasons), the break in the pattern allows for adjustments that would otherwise be highly visible if it was one continuous pattern.
The pattern doesn’t go on for terribly long (you can see a break in the pattern towards the left of the photo, where there is actually a set of 3 aligned rows instead of 4).
They could have accomplished the same thing in a more uniform way by placing the tiles in the standard half-interval or quarter-interval pattern across all of them. The only thing that makes any sense to me is that it’s quicker/ faster to align the tiles than it is to offset them, but they couldn’t have them aligned the whole way for the reasons you outlined.