cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/65235734

On August 8, police arrived on the scene of Long Branch Lagoon Water Park in Dodge City, Kansas, to the sight of three self-described “bearded, burly men” who had been in the women’s bathroom and changing area. The manager of the municipally run property allegedly screamed and rushed children out the door.

The men knew this was likely. They didn’t agitate any of the women; they didn’t remove their clothes or make crass comments. They simply used the gendered spaces that the state of Kansas requires them to use by law, because these men are transgender.

“Supporters of SB244, including Attorney General Kris Kobach and Senate Majority Leader Ty Masterson, billed it as a way to keep men out of women’s spaces; it clearly requires some men to enter women’s spaces,” a press release sent to news outlets reads. So, these men took action—using malicious compliance to prove their point.

“Segregating people by suspected genitalia does nothing to improve public safety; it does quite the opposite by opening Kansans up to sexual harassment and discrimination. At no point should anyone be asking anyone else what genitals they have in public.”

The men, dressed in yellow “Compliance Crew” shirts, were part of a small group of trans-masculine Kansans who used the women’s room at facilities across the state that day in a coordinated action. They were also spotted at a zoo, a library, a museum, and other parks. They were in Emporia, Great Bend, Garden City, and Dodge City. At the library, at least one patron complained; at other places, the men used the bathroom and received dirty looks, and simply left the space without confrontation.

But at Long Branch Lagoon, members of the Kansas Compliance Crew resorted to having to describe their genitals to police in order to resolve the matter and avoid arrest.

“The men had a discussion with the manager and police and explained the situation, including uncomfortable descriptions of their bodies,” the press release said. Furthermore, both the manager and the police reportedly said “they had never heard of SB244 nor been notified by any government entity of its passage.”

“I could easily continue using the men’s restroom under the radar,” said Ray Vieux, who participated as one of the demonstrators.

  • NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    7 hours ago

    And you think this would be easily resolved with well designed unisex bathrooms where each stall is completely private.

    1000064242

    • moondoggie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Ally McBeal’s law firm had one like that almost 30 years ago. You’d think there would have been more of them popping up, at least in law firms.

    • OwOarchist@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      6 hours ago

      where each stall is completely private.

      But then what if people do the drugs!??!?!?!

      Gotta have those stall gaps to make sure nobody ever gets high.

      • NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Hey as long as people are washing their hands then it dont matter to me.

        So often the person next to me walks out without a rinse even lmao

    • Fuckfuckmyfuckingass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I love this. The one time I used a gender neutral bathroom I was annoyed because there were no urinals. Meaning I had to wait for the slower sitting pissers.

      95% of the time I’m using a public restroom it’s to drain the main vein in the piss trough and move on.

    • auzy1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Thats what they did at my climbing Gym (Urban Climb). They’re full length cubicles and seem soundproof pretty much.

      Gendered bathrooms only triggers homophobes in practice. If you had a unisex bathroom, they wouldn’t even notice. And on facebook at least, it always seems to be the people who seem highly abusive, who you wouldn’t want near your kids anyway who make a big deal about it.

      At concerts here in Australia, because switching to unisex, it was fairly common for many women to line up for the mens bathrooms (as they they were often less busy)

      If your first instinct is that “they’re going to rape your kids”, the problem is you

    • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I’ve actually used a bathroom designed exactly like this before. Was definitely weird experience as an American

      • NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        It’s strange people of a different sex can’t wash their hands next to each other.

        Also there really no difference between the picture/layout above and going to a concert and seeing this.

        1000064248

        Communal sinks and seperate “stalls”.