Port forwarding is a function of NAT. It’s only needed because there aren’t enough ipv4 addresses for every device, so in most networks a lot of devices share a single ip and specific ports are forwarded to specific internal hosts
IPv6 has a large enough address space that this isn’t needed. You can still do it if you want. But mostly you just need a firewall without any NAT.
There’s more to it than this but you should get the idea.
I use a Reolink camera for this purpose. Its not self hosted but it’s solar capable and doesn’t need an inbound firewall rule.
Is the traffic not already encrypted? What would wire guard be providing here?
What’s the question
50psi is dangerous.
Edit: I mean if a tire blows out when over inflated that much, it becomes a legal problem. Whoever inflated it that much, or their supervisor along with the company, is negligent
It’s selective. You just provide the internal address or the Tailscale host name. All other traffic runs outside of the vpn tunnel.
Honestly it takes 10 mins to set up you should try it out.
Well yes but that’s a one-time setup.
Back in the days of dial up and bbs this was a problem but you would still get robots trying to connect to modems by dialing every phone number possible.
A mix of that and tomato paste, fish oil, garlic, ginger would probably mix things up for you.
I’m guessing you could substitute a 2:1 mix of paprika:cayenne.
Tailscale meets your needs even without an exit node configured.
Why are they so much more expensive…
Because people will pay that much for those features. You can find managed switches for $60 pretty easily. Until you get into the 48port blades they don’t change a whole lot, so the higher prices are typically from different ways to trick you into paying more.
Some features like line rate, buffers, do add to the cost though.
I’ve owned them for a while but agree. I’m also going to pick up 1 or 2 rack chassis models soon for free, which I would recommend over paying for a qnap.
Slap your knees , say “whelp…” then stand up and walk away.
I answered the 2nd part of the question.
Off the shelf NAS like Synology or qnap both have this feature.
No I don’t think that would work.
I went with a nas since I needed storage and barely any compute, and I wanted it on all of the time. I also wanted a cloud sync service.
Keep in mind that SMB and NFS work fine across any network but iSCSI needs a reliable hardwire network with decent buffers on the switch.
Attaches storage uses USB which isn’t that great. eSATA is better. External drives start to add up too.
You responded to a question with an incorrect answer. I was correcting that.
VPNs shouldn’t need to forward any ports when using ipv6. They can provide an entire ipv6 subnet to you.