In some cultures, men don’t like women who haven’t had their labia and clitoris removed. Does that preference justify the practice?

Removing the foreskin removes thousands of nerve endings and desensitizes the glans.

Well they do have an obsession with gay stuff, so maybe they prefer their young twinks cut?

It wouldn’t apply to anyone 19 or older, as that definition is an aspect of the order and the age range is defined.

If they passed a law that expanded the definition to all ages, then vasectomies, hysterectomies, mastectomies, circumcisions, etc. would all be banned due to the sloppy and imprecise language.

If infant male genital mutilation ends, I see that as a win.