7·
14 days ago[Tesseract is] a Photon fork.
TIL that Tesseract is a Photon Fork. Would you know, by chance, at what point in Photon’s development it was forked to form Tesseract, and what the rationale was?
Kalcifer
All of this user’s content is licensed under CC BY 4.0.
- 9 Posts
- 26 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
Cake day: October 20th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
38·17 days agol a p p i e s
That’s pretty neat!
You’re welcome! 😊
IDK if they’re “Fediverse specific”, but I love SSTF’s (@setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world) art.
2·3 months agoCould you please define exactly what you mean by “left-wing”?
1·3 months agoWhat client are you using?
I use Lemmy UI [1], Tesseract [2], and Thunder [3].
References
- Type: Repository. Name: “lemmy-ui”. Publisher: [“LemmyNet”. “GitHub”]. Published: 2025-04-02T16:19:00.000Z (Commit: “74864c165ca799d141314ec1d1c2d0ecf7f64b7a”). Accessed: 2025-04-03T08:06Z. URI: https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy-ui.
- Type: Repository. Name: “tesseract”. Publisher: [“asimons04”. “GitHub”]. Published: 2025-03-20T12:16:39.000Z (Commit: c49e93a74c20d352174afca80105b6d941d3cb12). Accessed: 2025-04-03T08:08Z. URI: https://github.com/asimons04/tesseract.
- Type: Repository. Name: “thunder”. Publisher: [“thunder-app”. “GitHub”]. Published: 2025-04-02T18:45:10.000Z. (Commit: 2e7b9127a1aff210d0a2af32aafdff554e73aef5). Accessed: 2025-04-03T08:09Z. URI: https://github.com/thunder-app/thunder.
[…] Boost is totally screwing up the references display
Yeah, I’ve heard report of that bug in Boost before [1] [2].
Out of curiosity, what does it look like for you?
References
- Type: Comment. Author: “Kalcifer” (“@Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works”). Publisher: [Type: Post. Title: “Happy #GlobalSwitchDay”. Author: “@squirrel@discuss.tchncs.de”. Publisher: [“Fediverse” (“!fediverse@lemmy.world”). “sh.itjust.works”. Lemmy.]. Published: 2025-02-01T07:08:40Z. URI: https://sh.itjust.works/post/32046509.]. Published: 2025-02-02T04:56:40Z. Accessed: 2025-04-03T07:51Z. URI: https://sh.itjust.works/post/32046509/16441818.
- Type: Comment. Author: “Kalcifer” (“@Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works”). Publisher: [Type: Post. Title: “I just wish more people were willing to try out the alternatives”. Author: “Sunshine (she/her)” (“@Sunshine@lemmy.ca”). Publisher: [“Fediverse memes” (“!fedimemes@feddit.uk”). “sh.itjust.works”. “Lemmy”.]. Published: 2025-01-12T23:12:46Z. URI: https://sh.itjust.works/post/31006865.]. Published: 2025-02-05T03:39:19Z. Accessed: 2025-04-03T08:00Z. URI: https://sh.itjust.works/post/31006865/16502481.
It’s not off-topic when the person in question is involved. […]
As stated in the title, the topic is concerning the AI bots that are spamming GitHub repos [1], not anything to do with nutomic. I personally encountered the bot in nutomic’s repo [2], so I simply used it as a generic example. Given this, your comment feels off-topic, imo.
References
- Type: Post. Title: “There now exist bots that spam GitHub repos with AI generated solutions to issues”. Author: “Kalcifer” (“@Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works”). Publisher: [“Mildly Infuriating” (“!mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world”). “sh.itjust.works”. “Lemmy”.]. Published: 2025-04-03T01:06:34Z. Accessed: 2025-04-03T05:48Z. URI: https://sh.itjust.works/post/35468786/17744627.
- The title of the post is “There now exist bots that spam GitHub repos with AI generated solutions to issues”.
- Type: Comment. Author: “okFduCi8nl6bRz”. Publisher: [Type: Post. Title: “[Bug] Forking an article triggers notifications to be sent for every previous edit up to the point of forking.” (#129). Author: “Kalcifer” (“K4LCIFER”). Publisher: [“Nutomic/ibis”. GitHub.]. Published: 2025-04-03T00:16:06.000Z. URI: https://github.com/Nutomic/ibis/issues/129 (Alternative (Archive): https://web.archive.org/web/20250403003232/https://github.com/Nutomic/ibis/issues/129).]. Published: 2025-04-03T00:19:44.000Z. Accessed: 2025-04-03T00:58Z. URI: https://github.com/Nutomic/ibis/issues/129#issuecomment-2774030467 (Alternative (Archive): https://web.archive.org/web/20250403003232/https://github.com/Nutomic/ibis/issues/129#issuecomment-2774030467.).
- Type: Post. Title: “There now exist bots that spam GitHub repos with AI generated solutions to issues”. Author: “Kalcifer” (“@Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works”). Publisher: [“Mildly Infuriating” (“!mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world”). “sh.itjust.works”. “Lemmy”.]. Published: 2025-04-03T01:06:34Z. Accessed: 2025-04-03T05:48Z. URI: https://sh.itjust.works/post/35468786/17744627.
Maybe a joke at the expense of StackOverflow. […]
Yeah, I figured that, but I don’t understand how it’s relevant to the topic of this post.
I’m not sure I understand the relevance of your comment. Could you explain?
[…] Who’s that […]?
I presume they are referring to @nutomic@lemmy.ml [1]; nutomic is one of the main Lemmy developers [1.1].
Context? […] what does he have to do with this post?
If they are indeed referring to @nutomic@lemmy.ml, I presume they are mentioning nutomic because the example GitHub repository that I cited [3] is owned by nutomic [2]; that being said, specifically regarding their claim itself that nutomic is transphobic [4] and is a genocide denier [4], it is entirely off topic, imo.
I will make no comment on the veracity of the claim itself without evidence. I do not wish to speak for nutomic — I will let them speak for themself here should they wish.
References
- Type: Webpage (Profile). Name: “@nutomic@lemmy.ml”. Publisher: [“@nutomic@lemmy.ml”. “Lemmy” (“lemmy.ml”). “Lemmy”.]. Accessed: 2025-04-03T01:58Z. URI: https://lemmy.ml/u/nutomic.
- Biography.
Lemmy maintainer
- Biography.
- Type: Webpage. Name: “Nutomic/ibis”. Publisher: [“Nutomic”. GitHub]. Published: 2025-04-02T14:42:54.000Z. Accessed: 2025-04-03T02:00Z. URI: https://github.com/Nutomic/ibis.
- One can see in the repository identifier “Nutomic/ibis” that it is owned by “Nutomic”.
- Type: Post. Title: “There now exist bots that spam GitHub repos with AI generated solutions to issues”. Author: “Kalcifer” (“@Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works”). Publisher: [“Mildly Infuriating” (“!mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world”). “sh.itjust.works”. “Lemmy”.]. Published: 2025-04-03T01:06:34Z. Accessed: 2025-04-03T02:03Z. URI: https://sh.itjust.works/post/35468786/17744627.
[…] I recently encountered one of these AI bots in Ibis’s GitHub repository.
- Ibis is the cited GitHub repository.
- Type: Comment. Author: “Deceptichum@quokk.au”. Publisher: [Type: Post. Title: “There now exist bots that spam GitHub repos with AI generated solutions to issues”. Author: “Kalcifer” (“@Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works”). Publisher: [“Mildly Infuriating” (“!mildlyinfuriating@lemmy.world”). “sh.itjust.works”. “Lemmy”.]. Published: 2025-04-03T01:06:34Z. URI: https://sh.itjust.works/post/35468786/17744627.]. Published: 2025-04-03T01:36:27Z. Accessed: 2025-04-03T02:08Z. URI: https://sh.itjust.works/post/35468786/17744627.
Eww Nutomic the transphobic genocide denier.
- Type: Webpage (Profile). Name: “@nutomic@lemmy.ml”. Publisher: [“@nutomic@lemmy.ml”. “Lemmy” (“lemmy.ml”). “Lemmy”.]. Accessed: 2025-04-03T01:58Z. URI: https://lemmy.ml/u/nutomic.
[…] Solarpunk’s Pleasant Politics comm has an automod that bans and unbans based on recent karma ratios. […]
Do they have any documentation for that behavior? If so, could you link it?
Karma does not persist […]
I’m not sure what you mean; if I look at your account, for example, I can see all of your past vote scores [1].
References
- Type: User Account. Publisher: [“geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml”. “sh.itjust.works”. “Lemmy”.]. Accessed: 2025-03-28T02:12Z. URI: https://sh.itjust.works/u/geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml.
- Outlined in red are the vote scores for some of the user’s most recent comments and posts.
- Type: User Account. Publisher: [“geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml”. “sh.itjust.works”. “Lemmy”.]. Accessed: 2025-03-28T02:12Z. URI: https://sh.itjust.works/u/geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml.
HA, that’s so cursed. I love it.
Zero. I believe that the negotiations of an employee’s market value are between the employee and their employer. I don’t believe that it is my responsibility to charitably subsidize a company through the subsidization of their employees’ wages.
12·4 months agoBasically, every search engine has incorporated LLMs and are shoving them down your throat. If we are talking about tools that I would find useful I’d rather have a reverse image search. […]
So, for clarity, are you saying that a reverse image search tool is more useful to you than AI integration, yet search engines are pushing for AI integration rather than reverse image search tools, and they may not have reverse image search tools at all?
deleted by creator