• 0 Posts
  • 147 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 22nd, 2023

help-circle




  • The simple math is, for almost every forced-laborer “blocked”(real-speak: denied entry, or deported upol discoveryd…), China will bring-in a CCP shill. If the forced-laborer isn’t qualified to do the work, then why try to smuggle them in? … but are only those qualified to do the work “worthy” of asylum? Once you’ve ensured they get paid appropriately(by China…) and treated with respect, they are no longer forced-labor…

    … but yeah, x workers are going to be required to do the work. If a portion of them are “accidentally” liberated from hellish conditions back home, and their oppressors jailed, how is that not a win?

    Save some (more)Uyghurs and arrest some human traffickers, versus force China to bring-in only spies and shills, because the best way to solve a problem is to deal with oppressors so long as they agree to leave their worst-off victims back home.

    Yes, my way you end up with more bodies, and resources to house and feed imprissoned traffickers, but that’s why you send China the bill. It could ultimately be cheaper for Canada to do the right thing.












  • I don’t care about the 25th because this joker will let Congress go back to business-as-usual, pretending they’ve fixed anything. No. you morons own Orange man and the office you’ve inflated to insane levels of power over the last few decades.

    If the 25th fails, there’s a chance they walk any of the various expansions of the Executive Branch’s power back at all. Otherwise, Congress is perfectly happy to let one man have the power to bomb other countries without so much as a nod to Congressional Authorization; To their way of thinking, its plausible deniability, when really its little-if-any short of saying “The King Must Crusade, after all”. Basically a declaration of on-going war against the world, and they’ve gotten by with pretending otherwise for too long.


  • I mean, yes, but I thought you were saying her politics weren’t left-enough to be called such. Justifying a leftist terrorist attack that killed 25 people seems enough to warrant the label on its own, to me.

    I might be far-enough left to quote one of said terrorists, but 50 years later, just quoting them saying “we were right because Palestine” without context or qualification of any sort …

    … I can see why she would take it down, and I’m not sure I could ever be so impulsive as to go there and retract like-so. Then again, I haven’t been able to find the Tweet itself, and it wouldn’t surprise me to find that the article-spam is misrepresenting it.