Good point.

Thanks! I was wondering whether PieFed has one, tho…

Still, I can’t hold it against them for using it. Variety is the spice of life, and it is an interesting thing to learn about… I just don’t support reviving it into mainstream. Just like the dinosaurs.

Your linguists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn’t stop to consider whether they should.

Unfortunately, my body is a machine that turns spur-of-the-moment ideas into abandoned projects

If you two could have been compatible, I guess that is a shame. But there is nothing that can be done now but to learn and move on.

Also, am I correct to guess that he is repeatedly blocking you because he doesn’t want you in his life? Because if so, you should take the hint and stop trying to contact him. Move on. (And move off insta while you’re at it, one less big tech platform in your life.)

Maybe, but it just got stuck with me and had to get it off my chest.

… do we have a c/offmychest?

As someone who has been betrayed before, I still choose to make connections because I know that was an exception that confirms the rule:

Most people are alright.

I hope life’s been treating you better since you made this comment.

Funnily enough, x is often enough referred to as “iks” in my language (Croatian), and w is “duplo V” (double V) (but WWW is read as VVV).

Q, however, absolutely SLAPS as a letter.

I just use a remote-less git with a physical backup for that lmao. Probably easier than self-hosting a git forge

So dollars are actually pesos?

Connect.

It’s functional…ish.

(Let me know if this lemment got through)

(Also, I’m technically on PieFed now… but that’s basically Lemmy 2 or something, right?)

Without any elaboration, this is just a regressive buzzphrase and people will inevitably interpret it as such.

Nature abhors a vacuum, and at best, you will be asked to elaborate (which you could have done to begin with).

I am trying my best to think you had good but misguided intentions in commenting this, but I’m not sure what these are.

Unfortunately, to a lot of people, this does relate to something personal.

And to demand perfect rationality of people in such situations, or those sympathizing with said people, doesn’t seem very… rational.

Assuming the worst about people.

It’s so common and pervasive that even as I was reading the comments thinking about it, I fell for it while reading one of the comments.

Focusing on a point that one can address best and making the best possible case for/against it is probably better than trying to address everything at once.

Plus, if the full argument can be made without the weakest point, it should be. And if it cannot, then it cannot be made at all.

Is that why it’s called fed-iverse and pie-fed?

I mean, you are a box of feet. The boxes are physically placed inside you. They are into you… but literally.

… Oh, I made a typo. Will fix it now.

Nah, it’s accurate - you’re not into feet, the feet are (placed) into you.

EDIT: very unfortunate typo

Could do, although the name usage for this one is deliberate to match r/curatedtrolleyproblem which I started after r/trolleyproblem was overrun by a viral button dilemma (Please don’t ask).

Maybe one of them can be a redirect?

Is the thief happier to have stolen the bike than Shen is sadder to lose it?