But your poster said they were socialist now.

Your poster says China is socialist yet now you’re saying China will be socialist in 2035, you’re moving the goalposts quicker than Mao during the cultural revolution.

Do you have examples?

Because most of what you are listing is stuff that has been using ML for years (possibly decades when it comes to meteorology) and just slapped “AI” on as a buzzword.

You’re claiming they are socialist, yet the MoP are not in control of the workers, if you had read any theory you’d understand that an essentially capitalist system of social relations in which workers have no control & real unions are killed, is not socialism.

you would know that capitalism is required before doing socialism

Total cope, given far more transformative projects have taken place in regions without the level of capital the CCP has access to.

One point of tension is that under a system where you still need to get paid to get things needed to survive/enjoy life, any organization outside of the state will be incentized to only do what they have to do and have the workers have more freetime (either for leisure or other work), whereas salaried state employees would use that time for improvements.

My gut tells me this is a trade-off worth making but it might not be, perhaps it makes more sense to have state monopolies, maintained by the state as then additional capacity gets put towards improvements.

I’ve just not seen state enterprises turnout that well, wether it’s the NHS or the Soviet economy outside of wartime, I don’t agree with the capitalist critique that workers have no incentive to perform well at their jobs, because the USSR/NHS didn’t/doesn’t have a flat pay structure, so my best theory is the alienation of people from their labor is a huge factor. And this is also supported by my personal experiences as well as those of people I know who work in the NHS.

TL;DR it’s a good question that hopefully one day we will have the opportunity to figure out.

The state owning the mop isn’t communism that’s just state-capitalism.

What advances?

LLMs don’t have anything to do with abstract ideas, they quite literally produce derivative content based on their training data & prompt.

There are none, communism by definition requires there to be no state.

So first off anyone who says boring shit like calling you a “revisionist” or “read theory” is a moron unable to defend their position, they’re treating socialist theory like a cultish religion.

Or to put it another way MLs are dumb, ignore them.

Generally I think if there are state owned assets, work on them should generally be contracted out to cooperatives, as that puts workers truly in control (as opposed to being cogs in the machine) and allows workers to find a different cooperative to work at, but I don’t think there is any one “correct” answer.

The same can be said of the approach described in the article, the “GPLv4” would be useless unless the resulting weights are considered a derivative product.

A paint manufacturer can’t claim copyright on paintings made using that paint.

What if companies that offer a superior product are forced by markets to hold back competition. YouTube isn’t the exception, it’s the norm.

Seems like the easiest fix is to consider the produce of LLMs to be derivative products of the training data.

No need for a new license, if you’re training code on GPL code the code produced by LLMs is GPL.

Satallites are a really fucking dumb way to deliver internet.

They are especially dumb for delivering “unstoppable” internet.

If you want to deliver unstoppable internet the key is to make it impossible to detect, you’re much better running a fiber cable, but that ofc is pretty high risk if they discover it. Alternatively you want a mesh network that can change frequencies to prevent jamming.

ICE was established in 2003 (Futurama is older than ICE) and since it’s creation has been a shit show.

What purpose do you think they serve?

Personally I think borders should be abolished, but even if you disagree border security is already handled by CBP and anything else can be handled by existing police structures (this is litterally how the rest of the world does it).

ICE ONLY exist as a tool of white supremacy, they exist to terrorize non-white residents far from the border (a border that has existed for less time than indigenous people have lived here), because as previously noted border security is handled by CBP.

Basic pattern recognition from the last administration should teach Dems that a buisness as usual candidate, will be their last.

Have you seen the response from communities? libs and apolitical people are on the streets ready to throwdown against armed thugs, that’s giving me a lot of hope.

Electorally (sorry anarchists), even Democrats are talking about abolishing ICE, we’ll see what happens in the primaries if such Democrats can win control of the party, but even if they can’t what we’ve seen on the streets should scare them into compliance! Time to remind them that what is “legal” doesn’t matter if the will of the people is at odds with the “law”.