

The point of what? Life? Humanity? Existing? Existence?
I get the anti-anti-sexuality, but doesn’t this boil life down to… Not even procreation, but … Sex?
What about asexual people? What about… Wonderful moments or beautiful things or cake or socializing beyond sex? What about WORDS and complex thought and ideas and puns and coffee and art and adrenaline and naps and music?
I can’t say I entirely disagree with you, but I also don’t agree, primarily because I’m not sure exactly what the hill you’re dying on is. Can you elaborate a bit to help me/us understand exactly what you’re trying to say?
The issue is not in the accuracy, ease, and convenience of describing and being compatible with the human experience. It has never been that.
The issue is Fahrenheit’s/imperial units’ compatibility and division factor of 10’s compatibility with other units, and all of those scales and units being consistent and predictable.
It’s literally just two philosophies of going about seeing the world.
To disclose my bias, I was brought up with imperial units. The problem in most discussions of these two ideas facing off is that nobody discusses the real topic: The pros and cons of unification vs. the rote arbitrariness of the human existence and whether or not we want to stand behind yet again another self-centered description of the universe.
Measuring horses with hands is fucking weird, but because we experience horses from our own perspective, which is limited to our physical body, measuring in hands is a really easy way to understand that unit of measurement, as opposed to decimals of meters.