Our News Team @ 11 with host Snot Flickerman
Yes, I can hear you, Clem Fandango!


Nobody wants Kurds in their way.
…I’ll show myself out.


You make a pretty solid case yourself, pardner.


It is correct, but the former has become a slur over time, nor does “transexual” match because it’s not about who you desire, it’s about who you are. Heterosexual, homosexual, bisexual, pansexual, finsexual are all about what kind person(s) you desire sexually. It’s a mismatch and it is now a slur.
So it means transgender. Unless you’re an asshole.


I mean it’s why I hate people who self apply the term “ally” because a lot of “allies” do more harm than help.
Allyship is to be determined by those who need allies, not the people who talk big and claim to be allies while doing fuck-all.
If someone from a minority community decides I am an ally to their cause and calls me an “ally” then I am an ally, not because I self applied a bullshit label to make myself feel better about cisgender white guilt or something.


Yeah I agree on that, the doubles make it way more confusing, and its confusing enough to people since the prefix is an acronym while people are scanning dictionaries trying to figure out a root word that doesn’t exist.


Coined in July of 2014 on tumblr:
https://web.archive.org/web/20150324190159/pride-flags-for-us.tumblr.com/tagged/androsexual

The “fin” prefix means “feminine in nature” and so the opposite where you’re attracted to people “masculine in nature” is minsexual. This confuses a lot of people because normally a prefix isn’t also an acronym, it’s usually from a root word.
So, I think it’s a good replacement for gynesexual/androsexual, despite the slightly confusing nature of its origin.


Hijacking top comment to also add that there are words for men who are attracted to femininity outside of the bounds of cisgender women: gynesexual (older term, less inclusive due to implication of a vagina) and finsexual (newer term, more inclusive and drops implication of a vagina).
It is quite likely that many of those men actually fall into these categories even if they have not accepted that about themselves as of yet. Others are bisexual, and even others are pansexual, and haven’t “come out” as it were.
Especially if this is relying on self-reporting and how often men want to appear straight, the number of men who are wrestling with such feelings but still put down “straight” is probably quite high.


trans is short for “transgender.”


Bristol Myers Squibb also makes my cancer drug, Sprycel, which has a similar price tag at just over $18k a month without insurance.
They also make my mother’s heart medication Eliquis, which is similarly costly as well.


Did everyone forget that anyone can use any device and it’s not like any specific device is literally under your skin and directly, permanently tied to you? We aren’t teletubbies with our devices built into our chests.
How the living fuck do they expect this to work? What if it’s a shared device?
Everything about this shit is so fucking sutpid eat shit Starmer.


This is just an ad for just one service. Spammy crap.


Mostly pretty good, but I can’t find anything in the settings that clearly mimics those scanlines from interlaced video


I knew no one would believe the truth. *shrugs


Do you expect anyone to be honest about this? Do you think if someone honestly had a massive amount of sexual partners we would even believe them? It’s the internet, anyone can make up anything about themselves. Even if someone does answer honestly, if they really are a total sex fiend, people will just write it off as someone making shit up. Because it’s the internet.
Anyway, I lost count but I’ve bedded well over a hundred. Never married, no children, nothing to get in the way.
See what I mean? Am I lying or telling the truth? Only I know, and everyone else has good reason to doubt me.


Ayyyyyyyyyyyyy
I winced while writing it