The idea was to point users to a site that looks at an overview of past issues with a news source. I was unaware that this specific site was very loose with their grading of news sites.
I am not sure if you are aware, but in online forums, it is rare that someone will even read past the headline before giving their opinion. Expecting everybody to dedicate the time and effort for a thorough inspection of every news provider and their sources is a bit of a high ask, especially now with people trying to manage their lives and the onslaught of political breaking news.
If you would like to do a service to people, you can mention what your research has come to in those various areas. If they are skeptical, they can then double check your work.
Gotcha, thank you for being civil in your explanation. I appreciate you taking the time to break that down!