What I meant is that some people portray the thin flat object itself as a 2D object, e.g. a piece of paper opposed to a box. I do understand that it’s intuitive to associate the absence of a dimension with a value close to 0 for it and vice versa, because that’s how we visualize it.
Yes, they are only abstractions, just like numbers are. I do not understand your conclusion that they therefore do not exist.
I still upvoted this, because I can see where you are coming from. It’s frustrating when adults portray thin flat objects as “2D objects” to explain dimensions to children. It’s not a simplification; it’s simply wrong.
I disagree. Porn, just like attitude era wrestling and splatter horror games, are precisely targeted at teenagers.
Should they be addicted to porn? No, neither should adults be. Is porn content moderated enough across the internet? No, regardless who watches it.
It depends, but in most cases I can’t determine the exact minute on an analog clock. In practice, the quickest way is to choose the worse case.
Now that you have posted this on the internet, it’s probably too late to feel embarassed.
A.I. Artificial Intelligence by Steven Spielberg. Not sure if I was too young, but the emotions still haunt me to this day.
Do you mind if I do not do that?