To do what with it?

Purge their own administrations, presumably.

But all these people have their own friends, same as Gates and Musk and Jamie Daimon.

Company with a dozen different bespoke testing environments constantly telling me this.

When you’ve spent your whole life surrounded by these freaks, the outrage wanes.

There’s no real yield in being perpetually angry if there’s no outlet for the frustration.

Have you tried blowing on it?

Not wildly.

This is like a criticism of Schindler’s List because it portrays a genocide.

It’s like criticizing an article about Schindler’s List with the bolded caption “Find out how many kikes can fit in an oven”.

It’s funny because there is plenty of horrifying and deliberately salacious shit that they did with Shields that would merit more criticism.

The quote directly below a photo of her and Woody Allen is more than I needed to see, thanks.

On April 4, 2007, shock jock Don Imus referred to the Rutgers women’s basketball team as “nappy headed ho’s” following their Cinderella Story NCAA playoff run that left them the number 2 women’s team in the nation

It’s how these fuckers talk about everyone.

It didn’t go into hiding at all. None of the associates in the Epstein files seem to suffer any real consequences. They’re all still doing sex parties at St. Barts on their oversized yachts full of teenage girls or snorting lines of coke at Miami Freak Parties hosted by CIA-connected cartel guys and their real estate magnet friends.

I think I am going to learn more about pyrotechnics.

Just fly a birthday balloon near a Texas airport and you can set off the worst disruption since 9/11.

It’s a 45 year old story. Woody Allen in the photo montage is a big red flag. But I wouldn’t exactly call this breaking news. Brooke Shields had been out about her atrocious treatment even before #MeToo.

Bloomberg Democrats are just the new Reagan Democrats

It’s a direct quote

Bit more than coded, tbh

Less crime before Brexit, too. It appears crime peaked during Brexit. Definitely something to think about.

The curious thing about US crime statistics is that we only count crimes against the state. We never count crimes committed by the state.

I would argue that US Crime has been sharply on the rise, from within the organs of the government itself (and its corporate affiliates).

Sharp Decline

rimshot

You could make this graph about pretty much any crime-news coverage over the last 40 years. “If It Bleeds Then It Leads” has become western media orthodoxy.

Friendly reminder that Boris Yeltsin shelled Parliament back in 1993

Ffs, the response to the LA Riots in '91 happened two years after Tienamen.

Nevermind the police response to Occupy Wall Street and BLM.

Imagine a scenario where an American government deployed armed soldiers into the center of a city to suppress a civilian revolt against the government.

A thing that has never happened before.

Make whomever this is the governor of Minnesota