Formerly /u/Zagorath on the alien site.

  • 7 Posts
  • 213 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 15th, 2023

help-circle




  • Zagorath@aussie.zoneOPtoSigh-Fi@quokk.auUniversal Translator
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    13 days ago

    Without actually doing any research or analysis, I feel like in English we’d say “the Sahara” slightly more often than “the Sahara desert”, but both are pretty common. I don’t think I would ever just say “the Avon”, but I would just say “the Thames”. So I think it comes down to how large the object looms in my mind, whether it feels acceptable not to include the descriptor.








  • 3x / week is the minimum-threshold to sustain a yt-channel

    Eh? There are excellent popular YouTube channels that post way less frequently than that.

    I think it would be a mistake to try and draw any clear comparison between a YouTube channel and a Lemmy community. But for YouTube, I’d say weekly is really the minimum of where you want to be while trying to grow.

    fitness-workout-threshold: 3x / week sustains our health, 4x / week brings us closer to our optimal health

    I ran a 3:15 marathon on 7 runs per fortnight, and a sub-18 min 5k on roughly 3 runs per week. On the other hand, I wouldn’t dare try a triathlon, even a relatively modest goal of 2:30:00 Olympic distance, on fewer than 2 runs, 2 rides, and 1 swim per week, for 5 total workouts minimum.

    Exercise is even harder to compare to Lemmy than YouTube is, in my opinion. Because with exercise, the length and intensity of that exercise plays such an enormous factor.









  • This doesn’t have anything to do with sort ordering though, which is based on time and votes. Text search is just a filter on top of sorting.

    That doesn’t feel like how search should work. It should be ranking results that fit the search query better higher than ones that fit it less. Regardless of how the search is done, that should remain true. So if you’re using trigram matching, instead of a binary “does the comment contain 80% of the trigrams in the search query”, it should be “if it contains 100% of the trigrams from the search query, rank it higher than something with 90% match, which is higher than 80%.” Or maybe not that precisely, but something so that more relevant results appear above less relevant ones.

    Without doing something like that, it’s just…not very useful. Which is the observed behaviour of search on Lemmy right now which started this whole conversation.


  • Eh, I don’t think it’s that surprising. Getting a list of comments on a post vs getting them from a search term are very similar operations, so it doesn’t make too much sense for these to have different queries in the backend

    Sure, but one would have thought that the ordering in a search is fundamentally different from the ordering in other places. Because you want something that contains the words you’ve searched for near each other to appear ahead of a post that has those words scattered at random because it’s a 500 word essay. You want exact word matches prioritised ahead of entirely unrelated words that include the same characters. Like “enum” should turn up your comment, but rank a comment that contains the text “renumbers” much more lowly. A particularly smart search page might keep “enumerate” high while rejecting “renumbers”, though.

    Of course, it’s true that at least in the current latest release, Lemmy fails at all of this. I hope 1.0 is at least fixing some of it?