

My position on conspiracies is that they exist but without evidence there’s no reason to believe I’m the magic genius who will figure it out. But, this attempt seems kind of suspicious? Of course, it could just be the result of them only keeping people on the job who are loyal, as opposed to competent (since with this presidency, those two traits can’t be aligned). I guess I’m at “we’ll find out at some point” again.





You know, “went to times square” is very easy to understanding without the “l.” It reads informal, but I’d get it. The end part of your example would leave me wondering what was good. The friend? The time they had together? Was Times Square itself good? I don’t as easily fill in the subject like I did with the missing “I” at the start. I think it’s called “left edge omission?”