Yes. I also agree the way you say it can betray the implication. If someone suggest a feature and your only reply is “PRs welcome ;)” it points to it being dismissive. However, after being in the “game” for a while so to speak, I can also understand dismissiveness as well since there’s plenty of people who do drive-by suggestions and get upset when the developer doesn’t immediately jump to implement them.
An aside: this “feel free to open a PR” - without any justification or discussion about the merit of issue at hand - is the standard passive-aggressive response from every developer who is not interested in making the change. It’s sad to see that it’s also becoming the go-to retort for the project cheerleaders…
That’s absolutely not true. I can’t speak for all developers of course, but as someone who is juggling multiple large FOSS project, when I give that reply, 99% of the time I would like that feature, but I don’t have the resources to do it myself.
Not trying to dissuade you or anything, but out curiousity, how do you imagine WP’s pivot to GenAI will affect your installation? Or is it just a case of not wanting to support their developers?
I think switching to the same URLs and a familiar backend is going to be really hard. Since you’re not coders, It might perhaps be simpler to make a clean cut and switch to a new CMS and archive/freeze the old site.
I agree that banning for posts 7 months apart is not ideal. I’ll ask them to take it a bit less strict.
These communities routinely get people serially downvoting them and since lemmy doesn’t present a way to avoid that, they resort to banning people who are seen as only downvoting. They don’t ban on a single downvote either.
I can see your downvotes on my end. I don’t know if your software federation broke or what else happened.
You’ve been caught downvoting at least 4 posts
https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/46465818 https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/61834209 https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/61834207 https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/46403765
The mods of those comms do not ban from one vote.
Haha no, it’s ours and anarchist.nexus, but we may add more soon
Lol, nah. It’s our confederation of anarchist instances
. I’ve seen this in the mod logs where someone has a relatively innocuous comment removed just because the mod disagrees with them, then they are suddenly banned from both that community and 10 or 12 other communities. All run by the same moderator.
Some instances will flip them the bird, like I imagine db0 won’t stand for that shit.
Oh I hope someone tries to pull this shit in the flotilla…👹
Great article. Thanks
But where are those models. The author tried to found open torrents but couldn’t.
Nightmare scenario. My condolences
You can only interact with mastodonians if they interact with something on the threadiverse first. If they leave a comment on a lemmy post, you can reply to them, but due to the way they expect federation to work, they will not announce it to the instance hosting the comm you’re in, so if you’re from a different instance than the comm, only people in your own instance will see any replies to your comment coming from mastodon.
took much of lemmy.world down. I wonder how come I’m seeing some posts from lemmy.worlders though
https://gui.fediseer.com/. It provides crowdsourced instance reputations coming from other instances, so it can easily be used through tooling to achieve this.
Let’s agree to disagree
I wasn’t talking about anything like this. More about of a way for banned people to have a public place to appeal. For just calling out bad behaviour and putting peer pressure, there’s !yepowertrippinbastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com
!GenP@lemmy.dbzer0.com