挂路灯人

Your asking me if my question asking you if you have a point has a point? Hmhm.

Yes I’m asking if your inane question has a point.

You can quickly evaluate the interests by reading the essays written by Chinese citizens instead of crying about it.

1. I am a Chinese citizen, I have a far better understanding of the general vibes of Chinese people regarding national topics than you or some writer cherry picking off the internet from Berkley.

2. No you can’t. If a Russian nationalist blog published a piece with 2 pictures of Ukrainians with nazi tattoos would that be enough for you to look past the clear interests backing it and agree that all Ukrainians secret love Nazis? I fucking hope not, I would hope you would see the interests and then take it with the required grain of salt and go do more research.

Please be more serious.

Just making it easier for people to quickly evaluate the interests behind this particular source. Do you have a point?

I never said I did, all I said was a sample size of 2 out of 1.4billion does nothing to offset owning interests. Again please be serious.

The plausible deniability of the few extra layers of separation between the ruling class and such media outlets most likely factors into it I’d have to assume.

Wow 2/1.4billion that really negates the clear interests who own the outlet. Obviously not. Please be more serious.

If you’d have no issue with someone pointing out who owns RT or Chinese media I don’t see why you’re taking issue with me making it easier for people to see the interests behind this source.

China digital times

Headquarters Berkeley, California

Type 501©(3) organization

The Translations Editor is Anne Henochowicz, an alumna of the Penn Kemble Democracy Forum Fellowship at the National Endowment for Democracy (NED). She has written for other publications including Foreign Policy

China Digital Times has historically been a recipient of funding from the NED

It’s always good to encourage people putting in the effort to learn something new

哈哈懂了 挺好的 慢慢来 加油

对 我是中国人 你中文挺好的 别急 慢慢来 加油 小提醒 你应该是想说美国人 不是没国人 美是美丽的美 没是没有的没

吃了吃了谢啦我会中文

Certain kinds of racism and bigotry are unfortunately highly normalised across much of the English language internet. It was nice to find a safe haven from it even if some still get through the gaps every now and then.

One of the few places on the English language side of the internet where racial abuse against not sufficiently self hating Chinese people isn’t normalised.

poverty rates plummeted all over the world during the 20th century

If you exclude China from those calculations global poverty by headcount is worse today than 1981 and roughly the same by percentage.

Dude, tried to give this a second chance, but you fucks are just regurgitating AI while accusing me of doing the same, with no fucking point.

Entirely untrue but if it makes you feel better about your self you can feel free to believe it. Also no one accused you of using ai? Are you hallucinating? You were accused of being arrogant, unintelligent and there was an implication of you being annasshole (which I feel is quite accurate given the crash out) nothing about ai that’s all you.

Spend all the money that you would inherit to pretend to be smart. Fuck all social media.

This is just a nonsense random non sequitur.

In reality, I am actually a rather nice guy, and I buy dinners for the homeless.

Hard to believe given you’ve been nothing but artogant and an asshole this entire time, but even if true so what? Do you want a standing ovation for doing the bare minimum of allegedly having human decency?

This was supposed to be a network that would protect against bots. And now we have meat puppets

More dehumanising nonsense fantasies so you can shield yourself from the fact that you are as unintelligent as you are arrogant.

Wow and now onto dehumanising me about… AI? What the fuck does AI have to do with anything?

Yes you are actually worse than the average Redditor was in my experience all the arrogance and somehow even less capable and intelligent (truly a spectacular feat I am very impressed).

Marx Engels or even any later Marxists have ever advocated for.

Marx, Engels, or even any later Marxists have ever advocated for.*

My apologies for not having perfect punctuation but your reading comprehension is truly abysmal.

Really unnecessarily aggressive for not being able to piece together the blatantly obvious fact I’m Chinese. No wonder your understanding of Marx is so poor if you can’t even manage this. Also what wall of text? It’s a sentence, a short paragraph, and 2 quotes if that’s a wall of text in your eyes it again speaks to your reading capability (or more importantly lack there of) and really demystifies how you could arrive at the completely nonsensical “understanding” you did.

Where are you from?

I invite you to take a guess given the obvious context clues.

I am only speaking to what the manifesto was proposing and nothing more.

You’re speaking to what you imagined it was proposing not at all what it actually proposed not to mind when you take into account the wider writings of both Marx and Engels (as is necessary to truly understand the pamphlet that the manifesto is) both consistently differentiate between the state as an instrument of class rule and what we would call the government as an institution providing a necessary function of administration in advanced societies.

While the merely repressive organs of the old governmental power were to be amputated, its legitimate functions were to be wrested from an authority usurping pre-eminence over society itself, and restored to the responsible agents of society itself."

— The Civil War in France

State interference in social relations becomes, in one domain after another, superfluous, and then dies out of itself; the government of persons is replaced by the administration of things, and by the conduct of processes of production. The state is not ‘abolished’. It dies out.

— Anti Duhring

I am also certain that you can provide nothing to back up the one world government claim (unless you choose to cherry pick and misinterpret harder than an evangelical) as it is simply not a position that Marx Engels or even any later Marxists have ever advocated for.