inkblade

You dismiss ideological consistency as a state agent tactic. That is intellectual cowardice. You use words like nuance and geopolitical realities to excuse Western hypocrisy. A moral standard applied selectively is not a standard at all. It is pure propaganda.

Acknowledging US hegemony does not mean accepting it as a shield for the UK to play moral arbiter. I do not run cover for China. I attack the illusion that the United States and its allies possess the right to dictate global morality. You concede the US is a rogue state. Stop making excuses for its diplomatic immunity.

You invent a defence of China to avoid the reality of US crimes. You ignore US state terrorism to protect your fragile worldview. If diplomatic relations require a clean human rights record, the US fails the test entirely. You cannot enforce moral standards selectively.

China commits atrocities. The United States committed genocide against your people. Both are facts. The UK happily hosts a massive US embassy. Demanding a ban on the Chinese embassy for human rights abuses while ignoring the United States is rank hypocrisy. If the UK must apply a moral standard, it should be done equally. The US death toll dictates their embassy must close first.

The United States has killed and suppressed Native Americans since the 1700s. European colonisation started this destruction in the 1400s. If China cannot have an embassy in England because of its treatment of Muslims, the US should not have an embassy anywhere. The US operates as the world’s most dangerous state terror group. Its historical death toll is catastrophic. The number of deaths caused by US actions exceeds those of Germany, the USSR, Belgium, Britain, and France. The casualties from allied nations like Israel add directly to this total. If a country is denied an embassy due to its actions, the United States must be the first nation banned.

The UK has American embassies too. The Americans have done worst to people than the Chinese.

And no I did not read the post.