Incessant tinkerer since the 70’s. Staunch privacy advocate. SelfHoster. Musician of mediocre talent. https://soundcloud.com/hood-poet-608190196
This can be done already with archive.is but we have no control
Did a little digging this morning. I honestly can’t find a selfhosted, archive.is alternative. All the solutions I came up with are either paid for and online use only, or free, but still online use only.
Well, what I was thinking/spitballing is that you could label your Caddy container, do updates on everything else. That leaves Caddy to administer when you can devote 15/20 minutes to rebuilding the Caddy container by itself. Not the most graceful, automated solution, but…
@curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
Despite all my rage, I am still just a rat in a cage
Again, I dig what you are saying, and I have a similar mind set. However, there is a strong faction of very vocal anti-AI anything, here at Lemmy. Both sides of the argument about AI coded projects or AI in general do have some valid points. However, in my estimation, and as I’ve said before, it’s 2026 and AI is here to stay. It is a good assumption that any project within the last 5 years or so has been at least AI assisted, if not outright vibe coded. Even updates to long standing projects now have AI involvement.
Yes, to me, the option to exercise your mouse wheel to glide over posts you are uninterested in, seems very obvious.
Automatic hostility and suspicion makes those kinds of conversations harder and less likely.
You’re preaching to the choir but I will give an amen.
I have tugtainer (something like watchtower) update caddy automatically, but I guess this set up would break that
Does tugtainer (always makes me giggle) have to ability to label containers for exclusion like watchtower does?
I did a little digging, and apparently there is a plugin for Lemmy for flairs. https://github.com/basedcount/flair/blob/main/README.md. Again, I have no experience standing up a Lemmy instance nor do I know how hard that would be to implement if that option was favored.
LOL It’s just one of those phrases that people say. Some history tho if you like to read the etymology of words and phrases:
it is unreasonable to ask people to disclose something just so others can shit on them for it.
I totally dig what your saying. I’m not a downvoter period. In my short time here at Lemmy, AI assisted projects are going to get shit on one way or another. It’s unfortunate, but it is what it is. I think the narrative of this thread is to attempt to make things conducive to all users. I personally do not outright reject AI assisted projects. My main concern is if I spin up a container and it turns out to be a doughnut. AI assisted or no, unless you speak multi code languages fluently, you are taking a risk either way. You are placing your trust in the dev and the few that can read code.
Absolutely. I was just going by what the OP requested. But you’re right. There are other ways to skin the cat.
I know nothing about running a Lemmy instance, so I thought I’d ask. Does the Lemmy framework allow something like this:
If so, maybe that’d be less annoying to some. The screenshot is from selfh.st.
Awesome. I have bookmarked it in my Projects folder. It does look rather intriguing.
Reasonable.
Ok, so see this AI Disclosure would be helpful in the original post. You’re going to get downvoted either way, but at least it’s upfront. Don’t take it personal, it’s just that there is a faction of very vocal anti-AI users here.
My 2p.
That’s very interesting. Thanks.
Now for the burning question on everyone’s mind…was this vibe coded, or AI assisted in any way? I don’t outright reject AI assisted projects, but of course my concerns are always security. Also, what is the depth of your experience coding?
Thanks
Can you specificy how AI has been used on this project?
I cannot. I’m not the dev.
I think [AI] tags would be good. That way a certain subset of members could just drive-by downvote without getting themselves dirty. [NOT AI] seems redudant since we’ve already defined [AI], but again for quick filtering purposes, I see no harm in both.
That seems reasonable. So, basically what I’m hearing is that AI produces a format or style of writing that some find off putting?
Yes, and I really dislike that. In my estimation, https://speed.cloudflare.com/ gives you a more comprehensive snapshot. Sites like fast.com, or you ISP’s own speed test usually concentrate on download speed and don’t actually measure under load, along with other variables.