

Depends on what specific things you mean, but it’s default acts similarly, and there are a large number of themes like so: https://github.com/GolDNenex/forgejo-purple-fever


Depends on what specific things you mean, but it’s default acts similarly, and there are a large number of themes like so: https://github.com/GolDNenex/forgejo-purple-fever


This timeline.
No gaming distro outperforms any other distro by any measurable means a user would notice.


FEX has been an Open Source project for quite some time. Valve has a use-case for it, so has been contributing developer resources and funding for the project, but Valve themselves did not create it. It’s simply a useful tool in a pivot they want to make for their portable gaming devices and expansion.
These spam accounts are getting old…


I don’t think it could possibly be measured because it’s something like: (file size ÷ block size) * num_writes
So it entire depends on the types of files, how often you’re utilizing writes to disk…etc. I just wouldn’t worry about it. If you REALLY want to estimate the tax: use iostat to check the number of writes on the drive in the last 24 hours, THEN enable online defrag and check it again in 24 hours. See what the difference is.
It really doesn’t matter for HDD though. Barely probably matters for SSD.


It should be a default, but I can see why it would be disabled for SSDs to prevent using cycles unnecessarily. If you’re using HDDs, check and see if it’s enabled.
Either way, unless you’re REALLY needing some minor performance improvements out of your disks, it shouldn’t make a huge difference.


Oops, you’re right. ZFS doesn’t have that.


There is no “normal” amount of fragmentation on modern filesystems that do things like CoW. That’s kind of the point.
If you’re reading and writing large files with a consistent amount of I/O, you’re going to have a higher amount of fragmentation because of the nature of CoW. This is by design. This doesn’t mean anything is wrong with the filesystem, just that peak performance soon after writing is not achieved. Btrfs and ZFS do online defrag and deferred scheduling of tasks for it to allow for EVENTUAL consistency as far as contiguous block forms go. The more free space you have, the sooner it will become cleaner.


We haven’t. Many states have new laws on the books about this issue, and others on the horizon. The issue is that they approved at one point, so there will most likely be a grandfather clause for existing ones on the road because you can’t force car manufacturers to go back and recall all these things to be retroactively compliant with a new law at cost to them. Not how laws work.


💯 it will render absolutely any site flawlessly, yup.


Amazing. It can ingest ANY website, and flawlessly render all content faster than any other browser converts to text. Built-in Ad and Content Blocking too!


Bunch of sites out there like: https://www.learncmd.io/


NocoDB, Baserow, Memento, and Sortable all have perfect mobile experiences without needing a native app. Pretty sure all of them have offline mode as well.


No, they don’t. This is another one of THOSE comments.


Any distro will work.
Both KDE and GNOME have super simple key mapping tools to set your Super key combos to whatever you want.
Remmina is probably the best RDP client available for any OS.


I don’t even know where you can get a VPS with that little memory anymore. I think this is just the nature of the kernel progressing and growing in features and size.
Maybe have a look at something like : https://github.com/trisweb/buildkern
The security model skews towards convenience versus absolute security, meaning automation is it’s goal, not perfect security. They use a reasonable amount of security to protect unauthorized access, meaning untrusted apps can’t access keys by default, and container apps only have selective access. AppArmor is supposed to be handling some DBUS interactions in the background to prevent any old app from grabbing everything, but again, automation is the purpose here.
If you don’t have a reasonably trusted system, then sure, it’s about as secure as any other password manager. I remember reading some time ago there was a plan to make a global framework for trusted application.accessnto things like this, but it was shot down for being “oppressive” in the same way as Microsoft’s trust app mess.
Ideally there would be an advanced mode where each app is granted access to specific keys, and that interaction is controlled by the user. This would never be the default obviously as the user interaction would be an insane annoyance to people who don’t care.