I do both.
The music I like is in my collection. I pay for it where I can, but I’ll be honest some of it is pirated because I just can’t buy it anywhere.
I also use Opentune to listen to YouTube music without logging in to stream stuff like “lofi chillhop beats”.
I recently saw around here a music discovery service (self-hosted) I might try. Can’t remember the name…
No, I mean outbound. Certbot needs the acme challenge to work properly. https://certbot.eff.org/faq/#can-i-issue-certificate-if-my-webserver-doesn-t-listen-on-port-80
BTRFS and ZFS both use block compression, ZFS by default. It’s meant to increase both storage efficiency and access speed and has nearly zero impact on performance. The files aren’t compressed from the filesystem point of view, which would satisfy your requirement not to need any other tools.
I’m confused about your statement that you don’t want to save space with compression, but you indicated that you want to “make the most of your storage”. Are you looking for long-term archiving?
It’s not clear here if you mean block compression, file compression, or stream compression.
It would be nice, but the time it takes to do the work of validating package versions for LTS candidacy is either limited or not free, so this is the acceptable compromise.
The certbot thing here is a clue: have you opened 443 and 80 on the router as well?
Zombie processes do not use resources, well, a little, it’s basically an entry describing how it exited.
Agreed, but a very poorly-written program having a hanging memory or disk write, or a file lock could become a problem, especially if hundreds or thousands of zombies are waiting for something.
Zombies that stick around for more than a few seconds indicate a signal problem in the parent process, where its init is stuck in the “wait” state, so the entry remains in the PID table.
It could be harmless, but it could become a problem if you need the resources. Curl shouldn’t be doing this on its own.
Sorry for the late reply.
I started reitti and it is indeed a pretty painless setup, so respect for that.
Reitti is entirely based on a timeline, whereas I record trips and tracks, which are based on location. This is mostly for hiking, but I do record long drives, canoe trips, and the occasional low flight in a Cessna (for Search and Rescue).
This is what my current gps track management looks like:
For my needs, I often will export particular trails or paths to fellow hikers and my Search and Rescue team. Having the option to go through a list of tracks is essential so I can share trail gpx with folks. Because there is no real way to identify specific tracks or export them in Reitti, I can’t use Reitti as it is now.
Other blockers for me using Reitti are:
Overall, I like your project, I just don’t really understand the use case.
Good work and I wish you good luck.
I guess I’m not really understanding your use case, but that’s OK.
How does Proton Mail Bridge work?
It’s an SMTP relay that is allowed to send to protonmail servers, but can accept local SMTP. So if your monitoring system, for instance, sends out emails, you can use this to get notifications via protonmail.
Understood, thanks for the response.
I’ll whip up a container later today and comment back here my experience.
Not the person who commented, but:
Wanderer on the the other hand, seems to be designed as a planning and tracking app for single trips. Correct me if I am wrong.
You aren’t wrong, but I’m going to try reitti for single tracks anyway, because 1) wanderer has introduced some serious breaking changes that prevent me from upgrading and 2) I think reitti would fit my use case of sort of hybrid between GPS always on and single tracks.
I’m a bit of a GPS nerdin the sense that I collect my trips. Car, hike, walk, plane, ferry… I just think it’s neat so see where i’ve traveled.
Maybe you should clarify who you mean by “they”.
But the mail flow goes into your gmail inbox and is analyzed when it it lands. How does this prevent google from reading your mail received by the gmail account?
Also, my comment about headers still stands: you can pull the email from a pop or IMAP mailbox, host it wherever you want, but the headers will always show how the mail was routed, dmarc, dkim, etc. unless you rewrite the headers in this process.
Edit: just FYI, pop and imap are not options for protonmail, unfortunately. They only allow their own client and their own “bridge”.
So just an export/import? How many email services even offer pop anymore? Even outlook dropped pop in favour of mapi and IMAP a long time ago.
When you transfer email hosts, they won’t know a thing about your previous inbox - why should they be privy to that?
Because the headers will have all the transport and delivery metadata from your old inbox? I don’t see how this obscures any of that.
I made the right decision to get two HP elitedesk g4 minis instead of one, and to give them both plenty of ram (before the shortage).
I temporarily “lost” one of them after a power outage revealed that the CMOS battery was dead in one. It’s back up and running, but it was nice to be able to simply import the containers on the remaining good unit while I fixed it up.
Test your backups! It’ll save you time and headache, plus you can feel superior to others.
I won’t comment on the when of it, you have a lot of good answers here already.
But I’d like to add that “performant” is a much lower bar than you think. Gigabit has been fine for my nearly 25 containers to use NFS as their storage, video streaming included.
This is a self-hosted sub. You are going to see a lot of anti-establishment, anti-corporation stuff here because it’s a core principle and/or concern of many users looking into self-hosting. That tends to come with attached behaviors like you described.
While I would tend to agree that it’s unfortunate that you have to wade through a lot of folks knee-jerk blanket commenting on certain topics, and that those screeching comments are annoying, Lemmy is generally a big tent, so you will need to accept their presence, the same way we have to just ignore all the AI Slop software presented here.
The price of freedom is accepting the screechers.
I saw your other response.
There is no evidence of national selectivity or “racism” involved here, you seem to be interpreting this yourself. The fact that this is about an EU-related fork is a coincidence.
It is the highjacking of the license to restrict the implied spirit of freedom is what is at issue here.
You aren’t concerned about a severity 10 vuln? Those are found in software with exceptionally bad qa and abandonware. That should give you pause about how hard n8n is “going fast and breaking things”.
I don’t really see what is so bad here… There was disclosure of type, but no reference to the exact code. This gives the maintainer a chance to reach out for specifics before bad actors can make a pseudo-zero day.
Is it the language you object to?