Frigate is popular.

I used to use ZoneMinder, it worked well, but you must be very familiar with onvif, primary/secondary channels, and key frames for it to work well.

I only switched to frigate because of the person/animal detection. It’s ok, but it does need some polish in a few areas like event retention, and it could stand some more approachable documentation.

Pangolin is a reverse proxy implementation, so it doesn’t really achieve the same thing as VPN software.

Kodak said “we don’t believe digital photography will take over” and iRobot is like “we’ve tried nothing and we’re all out of ideas”

What is your mobo model?

You can start with this, but does your motherboard support sr-iov? If you can’t use normal PCI passthrough because of lack of IOMMU granularity, the odds of it supporting SR-IOV are slim.

I didn’t know Jellyfin could search torrents. Do you mean radarr/sonarr?

Sorry, I bungled that by not adding context.

You’re right, subsonic server and its api are the source of all this. However, that api is completely open, which means there are many, many client and server applications that use it successfully.

Navidrome is a good server one, tempus, and here are a ton more!

Close, In this context, it’s this: https://subsonic.org/pages/api.jsp

This is the cost of offline password managers. You can’t do this at a file level, there is no way for a sync protocol to merge changes from two files. I say this having suffered thanks of a couple passwords from this exact scenario.

You either need to exercise diligence in only adding passwords at one place, or run a “real” db-based password manager.

Permissive licensing can create what is effectively “software tivoization” (the restriction or dirty interpretation of distribution and modification rights of software by the inclusion of differently-licensed components).

The Bitwarden case is a good example of how much damage can be done to a brand with merely the perception of restrictive licensing. obviously, bitwarden has clarified the mess, but not before it was being called ‘proprietary’ by the whole oss community.

So I don’t think op is referring to direct corporate takeover, but damage caused by corporate abuse of a fork.

Do you get hit more than the average person?

When I ran Nextcloud, it broke every other update. Mostly because NC didn’t seem to care that anyone had a 7-year-old install being migrated along.

I wish someone would jailbreak the Google home and Chromecast devicea so we don’t have to throw them away in a year when Google abandons them.

“Italian”?

I build software manually about twice a year, and I’ll be honest, I can’t really say I’ve had that experience in many years. Whether I’m using debuild to generate a deb package or a simple make/make install, the stdout feedback points exactly to the issue 99% of the time.

Sorry you had that happen, must be frustrating.

Then you will have to do it with bridging.

Create a second bridge and bind only the wan interface and the physical interface of opnsense to it. Then create a 2nd interface for opnsense, but bind it to the brIdge libvirt uses to connect its guests.

• Debian is a dependency hell, otherwise fine.

I agree on the older packages (I don’t need cutting edge), but what do mean about “dependency hell”?

Side note, I laughed a bit at this, I haven’t heard the term “dependency hell” since the old rpm Redhat days before yum.

Portability is not really an aspect one needs to consider when it comes to a NAS

Hard disagree, and it is one of the best things about ZFS. You can plunk a ZFS pool on another system and be almost certain it will import. Systems die. Having been through several data-loss incidents, I find it is much preferable to be able to pull 1 disk than have to drag out 2 or three to transplant a ZFS pool.

Regarding the scrubs, I was trying to indicate that ZFS is more than just a raid manager, there are advantages to ZFS on even a single disk.

for a home NAS, the goal is maximising data storage capacity without a major hit on performance

If that were entirely true, striping would be the most popular ZFS pool arrangement, since you get performance and max storage.

Edit: this was not to say “you’re wrong”, just different approaches to storage.

You can passthrough more than one device at a time. This is probably the source of your slow speeds.

Add a virtual nic to the opnsense VM and bind it to the host bridge, that way you can use both the VM network and the physical LAN without a lot of faf.

A dual disk setup for ZFS (or any other kind of RAID) is super wasteful.

Based on what? I’ve been running ZFS since it was Solaris-only and raidz1/raidz2 are OK, but they come with complexity and performance penalties, and they’re somewhat less portable than a mirror. There are many advantages to simple mirrors: first-response reads, block correction, scrubs, etc.