If you’re not pushing your paywalled stuff
I’m not, but that shouldn’t be part of this conversation.
Where is the line for what you’re saying is “paywalled stuff”?
If someone promotes Plex, for example? Not allowed? What about deluxe features of homeassistant, which is fully open source, but paid?
Promotion of a software product? Not sure I understand where you’re coming from.
And now I’m doubly confused why you dont get the Plex reference.
Unless they are a closed source dev looking to promote.
I’m not, I swear!
Jokes aside, your example of Plex is a good one to illustrate that we’re not all at the same ratio of FOSS use, some of us have more or less of each.
At which time as it becomes a problem it can be evaluated.
This is functionally what I’m concerned about, and your comment above addresses it. Thanks.
Thank for the clarification.
If you think this is about what I want, you haven’t been reading any of my comments.
I have read them, all of them. Your wording “I think it makes sense to…” suggests you’re making a decision. It seems based on community input, but is nonetheless still your decision. As it should be.
I don’t really have an opinion on the 10% rule, I don’t think anyone can help but make that an arbitrary number.
I do, however, think it’s a mistake to lean heavily toward favoring FOSS here because, as I mentioned, there is nothing preventing FOSS applications from making money. Further, it is very difficult to find software that is 100% FOSS through and through.
Ultimately, the line of what is FOSS and what isn’t is what will become a problem.
I do think it makes sense to include an exception for 100% free/libre open source projects.
Here we go again.
Both libre projects and free projects can make money via donation, patreon, or other business models. Allowing them a “vibe check” exception and not closed source or anything in between is propagating this notion that money and open source are mutually exclusive.
I appreciate the effort to establish some rules, but this is further entrenching the Lemmy self-hosting community in a mode where it’s a FOSS-only space, which is both uninclusive and inaccurate.
If what you want is a FOSS-only space for self-hosting, I’d like to know that so I can find or start a similar community where ppl who do use closed source tools can post questions.
Why? Nothing about self-hosted is FOSS-only. There’s a big overlap, to be sure, but this knee-jerk reaction to paid and closed-source apps doesn’t help anyone.
Page faults are memory-related and random reboots are either CPU or memory related, typically. I would run a memtest.
That makes sense. I use NFS, so there are other controls for security because “offsite” is another building on my property, but still in the same pool of subnets…
What’s the rationale for this? Genuinely curious.
They are set-and-forget, and no network engineers like tuning WiFi. I think the value is in not having to touch it.
Way back, i used to have a Linux TV with an app called Clementine on it for music. The magic was being able to just hit play on a song and the playlist used the scrobbles for LastFM to keep the thing going. Great for evenings with friends, it was like having Spotify before Spotify existed.
Feishin does this! It tries to keep the same style going, although I now used ListenBrainz instead.
The best case scenario is every one gets an equal slice of the pie so as no one player becomes the dominant force because everyone is fucking crazy.
One of the reasons I love FOSS is that it’s really difficult to corner the market and then try to screw people over, cause they’ll just leave. At the corporate level, it take a bit longer to leave because of contracts, but the principle still works.
Not that Sun was the best or anything, but when Oracle happened, it spawned projects we all know and love well.
Feishin has turned out to be pretty great.
Yeah, this is what led me to convert my APs to openwrt
Clamav is woefully behind on definitions, just be aware of that.
Your overuse of terms you don’t quite understand suggests your deep-dive isn’t that technical.
None of what your blurb says is new, and DPI has been around for longer than ten years.
Clanker.
On select machines.
You’d just take longer with more effort to get there
That may be. But I’ll retain what I learned. And the effort IS THE POINT!
I’ll repeat myself: GO LEARN IT YOURSELF.
Yeah, that tracks fine.
It’s the recent one where a person told this group about their app, asked if anyone was interested in beta testing in exchange for full paid app access for free.
I don’t think that person posted in bad faith. But the crowd here acted like an absolute mob, calling him names, telling him to f*ck off, etc.
That was handled poorly. And I don’t think your rule would address the abuse part, regardless of how much “community interaction” you made a requirement.
That’s my problem with these new guidelines, they don’t address the venom people have towards folks for not much justifiable reason. You can’t just bend to what the crowd wants, sometimes they want blood.