who

!foxnews@lemmy.sdf.org

You can also create your own search prefixes (keywords) in Firefox, which won’t have the extra step of routing searches through DuckDuckGo.

https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/bookmarks-firefox#w_how-to-use-keywords-with-bookmarks

Gross.

!til@lemmy.world

CGP Grey does excellent stuff, but I think it would fit some other community better than this one.

Bar Keepers Friend:

According to the February 26, 2020 Safety data sheet (SDS), Bar Keepers Friend Cleanser contains:

• 85–94% glass oxide (CAS 65997-17-3),
• 5–10% oxalic acid (CAS 144-62-7), and
• 1–5% benzene sulfonic acid, mono C10–16 derivatives, sodium salt (CAS 68081-81-2).

Bon Ami:

The product called “original” contains only feldspar. For other products, the Bon Ami website lists the following as main ingredients: feldspar, limestone, water, baking soda, citric acid, corn alcohol, epsom salts, essential oils, and xanthan gum.

See also: The Land of Gorch

The color of mead, which awaits you at the drinking hall!

You are not overthinking it. Exploiting this would be a bit more complex than capturing a packet on the wire, but it is possible.

If you intend to use a passphrase for anything important, it’s best to generate it locally.

FWIW, I don’t find that video convincing of anything, because it’s too difficult to see what the cable is doing, especially with respect to twist (or lack thereof) as it gets coiled.

If you find “over/under” confusing, that’s probably because it’s misleading terminology.

You might find it more intuitive to think of this as “outside/inside”, meaning that each new loop is made by bringing the cable’s free end up to your stationary hand either outside (away from the already coiled cable) or inside (between the already coiled cable and itself) as it forms the new loop.

I can’t use archive.today anymore, since they introduced a third-party CAPTCHA (from Google, I think). It’s a man-in-the-middle that monitors every archived article I visit and every Lemmy post that links me to one. Obviously, this is terrible for privacy.

The CAPTCHA also demands permission to run mystery code on my machine before it will show me the article. Again, no thanks.

So I’m back to archive.org’s Wayback Machine. I’ll have to give ghostarchive a look, too.

I thought of the same thing, but it turns out that sense of the word is unrelated.

The traditional shape of the molds used for pig iron ingots is a branching structure formed in sand, with many individual ingots at right angles to a central channel or “runner”, resembling a litter of piglets being nursed by a sow. When the metal had cooled and hardened, the smaller ingots (the “pigs”) were simply broken from the runner (the “sow”), hence the name “pig iron”.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pig_iron

Where is this brand common?

I think saying there is not interest in having a bandcamp community is a silly notion,

Okay, but nobody said that.

thr main thing that got me there recently was a recent push to use bandcamp because of the spotify ceo thing and a few notable artists of mien moving their main front to there.

Fair enough. My footnote was meant to inform, not to dissuade.

I don’t think there is one.

https://lemmyverse.net/communities?query=bandcamp

However, there are several for music, and I expect at least some of those must be for recorded music (rather than making music, as one would do at a band camp).

https://lemmyverse.net/communities?query=music

For what it’s worth, Bandcamp.com sold out to Epic Games, and were subsequently sold to Songtradr, both of which are a far cry from the independent and beloved music shop that Bandcamp once was. The interest in a community dedicated to them has likely diminished since then.

I’m a little surprised not to see “changeme” on this list.

With views like that you probably support AI too.

Or I probably smell bad. Or I am probably a monster. Or I probably do whatever else you can imagine that might sway community opinion against me for contradicting you.

Once again, you are wrong. In both senses of the word.

I suggest learning what words mean before you go round using them in public, especially in accusations. It might help you to avoid embarrassing yourself. And, if arguing with people is what makes you happy, consider learning to avoid informal fallacies while you’re at it.

It’s theft. You are stealing from artists.

No, duplication is not theft. Reproducing is not stealing. Not in the dictionary sense. Not in the legal sense. Not in any sense at all.

It might be copyright infringement, inappropriate, and/or rude, depending on the particulars and the jurisdiction. But your claim that it is theft demonstrates that you either have no idea what you’re talking about, or you are deliberately misleading people.

Please stop.

I think they know this, and were aiming to exploit that initialism by associating its negative connotations with the totally unrelated thing that they don’t like.