i personally think yes but it will take some years to fix the problem of most apps not working there.

what do you think?

  • ShimitarA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I am not referring to the chips themselves, but to the ecosystem around and the more often than not unlockable bootloaders and lack of something like bios or UEFI. Even on UEFI you can disable Microsoft keys and install yours, at least on decent ones.

    But yes, arm is an easier to reproduce architecture at this time, chip side at least

    • CallMeAl (like Alan)@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It seems like you are mixing up the “ecosystem” with the application: desktop, mobile phone, etc.

      10 years ago there were mobile phones running Intel Atom and they were just as bootlocked as any other phone. I personally have two intel based chromebooks and unlocking their bootloader requires taking them apart.

      Whereas my arm based Pinebook Pro requires no unlock at all. I have lots of Arm based SBCs and all of them came unlocked as well.

      • ShimitarA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        34 minutes ago

        Then, I stand corrected …

        Thank you