Your data, no because I have no access to the actually values. But just a plot of a line that seems very straight (but does not necessarily need to be), and measuring it manually will introduce some noise.
In my data, that I generated, yes there I know for a fact that it is from an exponential.
I am well aware what a graph is and that it shows the actually values, but to obtain some actually values to perform manually some calculations we need to extract some explicit values from the image. This is however not arbitrarily precise and therefore will add some noise to the extracted values.
Your data, no because I have no access to the actually values. But just a plot of a line that seems very straight (but does not necessarily need to be), and measuring it manually will introduce some noise.
In my data, that I generated, yes there I know for a fact that it is from an exponential.
The actual values are exactly as shown on the graph. Do you know what graphs are?
In your data what is the exponential function?
I am well aware what a graph is and that it shows the actually values, but to obtain some actually values to perform manually some calculations we need to extract some explicit values from the image. This is however not arbitrarily precise and therefore will add some noise to the extracted values.
My data is simply y = exp(x).
That’s the curve of the line?
Your data as in you generated it? Or that’s the function that fits the curve shown in the graph?
In the case I am discussing, the data is generated using the exponential function exp(x).
Which case is that? Have we moved goal posts or are you claiming this line:
Was generated using the function y=exp(x)?
This case here.
So your claim is that curve was generated using an exponential function?
I concede, that appears to be the case.
Now this one
What function generated this curve?
For reference, what is math education?